Re: [gnso-policyimpl-dt] Recap of meeting & items for review
hi Tim, the reason i threw that question about GNSO-only is because some of the issues that are being raised, for which "policy vs implementation" decisions need to be made, are coming from outside the GNSO. a couple examples come to mind -- SAC45 from the SSAC and the GAC Advice from Beijing. i would think both of those would in a perfect world get run through the policy vs. implementation decision making process. i'm fine developing a charter for a GNSO working group, but maybe we at least ought to write into the charter a recommendation that the WG make a concentrated effort to recruit reps from the other AC/SOs for their work. good catch on my "problems to be solved" wording. let me clarify. i mean those as the puzzles that the WG has to solve, not us. i'm hoping to see a list that looks something like that in the Mission part of the charter. thanks, mikey On Jun 15, 2013, at 4:21 PM, Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We are a GNSO DT, not a cross SO DT (thank God), so we should consider that > what we do applies only to the GNSO WG that follows. > > Regarding your problems to be solved, are those problems that you feel we > need to solve or that the WG that follows needs to solve? We are only tasked > with drafting the charter. > > Tim > > > On Jun 15, 2013, at 12:20 PM, "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> hi all, >> >> great discussion so far. here's my contribution. >> >> i took the liberty of redrawing Marika's diagram. no, this is *not* going >> in the charter, it's just a thought exercise to help me frame my charter >> questions, but i thought it might be useful for the discussion we're having. >> what follows are some ideas and questions for our charter that fell out of >> that exercise. i've left a lot of them out because Jordyn and Chuck got off >> the mark a little quicker than i did and covered much of what i was thinking >> about. >> >> Mission >> >> Problems to be solved: >> >> - Define the mechanism by which "policy vs implementation" questions are >> identified >> - during implementation efforts >> - prior to implementation >> - Define the criteria used to determine the difference between policy and >> implementation issues >> - Define the options available for policy and implementation efforts and >> criteria for determining which should be used >> - Define who makes those determinations and how >> - Define who reviews and approves those decisions and how >> - Describe the process by which this identification, analysis, review and >> approval work is done >> >> >> Scope >> >> - The work of this group >> Choice a) only applies to the GNSO? >> Choice b) applies to all ICANN AC/SOs? >> >> - If the choice is "all AC/SOs" does this fall into the cross-constituency >> WG arena? do different chartering/operating rules apply to the WG? >> >> >> mikey >> >> >> >> <Policy vs Implementation v2.pdf> >> >> >> PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: >> OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) >> >> On Jun 11, 2013, at 4:00 AM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Dear All, >>> >>> Thank you very much for joining the first meeting of the Policy & >>> Implementation Drafting Team. As a short recap of the meeting and follow up >>> on action items: >>> For those of you that were not able to attend the first meeting, please >>> feel free to share a few words of introduction with the mailing list. >>> Holly Raiche has volunteered to serve as a the Chair for this Drafting Team >>> and has received the support of those that were on the call. If there are >>> any other candidates that would like to be considered for this post, or any >>> statements of support / objections, please share those with the mailing >>> list ahead of the next meeting. >>> As discussed, please find attached a first draft of the charter template, >>> following the model of other charters as well as the information contained >>> in the call for volunteers. You are encouraged to share your comments >>> and/or edits with the mailing list ahead of the next meeting. >>> For those interested to review some other recent GNSO charters, please see: >>> 'thick' Whois PDP WG Charter (https://community.icann.org/x/vIg3Ag), >>> IGO/INGO PDP WG Charter (https://community.icann.org/x/I4NEAg), Whois >>> Survey Working Group (https://community.icann.org/x/xwS5AQ). Do note that >>> the first two are Policy Development Process (PDP) Working Groups which >>> means that the charter may include elements that are specific to PDP >>> Working Groups. >>> Attached you will the notes I took during the policy & implementation >>> session in Beijing. To review the full transcript or recording, please see >>> http://beijing46.icann.org/node/37133. >>> The next meeting has been scheduled for Monday 17 June at 19.00 UTC for 90 >>> minutes. >>> >>> With best regards, >>> >>> Marika >>> <Policy & Implementation WG - Charter Template - 11 June 2013.doc><Policy >>> and Implementation Panel Beijing 10 April 2013 - Notes.doc> >> >> >> PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: >> OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) >> PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) Attachment:
smime.p7s
|