Re: [gnso-policyimpl-dt] RE: Proposed agenda and updated draft charter for review

[Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree with Chuck. ICANN and/or GNSO structure(s) are in no way within scope.

On Jun 21, 2013, at 3:20 PM, "Gomes, Chuck" 
<cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

Eduardo,

I think that is just another way of saying the same thing, i.e., having the 
Policy & Implementation WG focus on GNSO & ICANN structure, so I would still 
have the same concerns.

Chuck

From: Eduardo Diaz [mailto:eduardodiazrivera@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 11:24 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; Marika Konings; 
gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-dt] RE: Proposed agenda and updated draft charter 
for review

Chuck:

What about if we change the suggested item #3 as follows:

Whether current GNSO processes are adequate to represent all stakeholders 
interests in the implementation of policy

-ed

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Gomes, Chuck 
<cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I do not support adding the topic of GNSO structure for several reasons:

1.       It will be part of the GNSO Review process, which will be a major 
undertaking.

2.       It will be a very controversial topic and hence will consume large 
amounts of time and resources and would likely detract from the main mission of 
the WG.

3.       The topic of policy & implementation is not dependent on GNSO 
structure.

Chuck

From: 
owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx>]
 On Behalf Of Aikman-Scalese, Anne
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 10:33 AM
To: 'Marika Konings'; 
gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-dt] RE: Proposed agenda and updated draft charter for 
review

Thanks,Marika.  Per my previous e-mail, I would amend Task 7. to state that the 
WG will review not only the ICANN By-Laws but also the GNSO structure in terms 
of multistakeholder participation.  So I would suggest as follows:

7.     Review the ICANN Bylaws and GNSO voting structure with a particular 
focus on the GNSO PDP<http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#AnnexA> 
and associated GNSO PDP 
Manual<http://gnso.icann.org/council/annex-2-pdp-manual-13jun13-en.pdf>, to 
determine:

a.      What elements of the process provide guidance regarding implementation 
of policies

b.      Whether there are any gaps in the Bylaws or process that leave 
ambiguity regarding implementation

c.  Whether the current structure of the GNSO is adequate to represent all 
stakeholders interests in the implementation of policy



Thank you, Anne



<image001.gif>Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700
One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725
AAikman@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxx> • 
www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman<http://www.lewisandroca.com/Aikman>
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information
intended only for the individual or entity named within the message.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is prohibited.  If this communication
was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original 
message.


________________________________
From: 
owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx]<mailto:[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx]>
 On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 12:27 AM
To: gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-dt] Proposed agenda and updated draft charter for 
review
Dear All,

Please find below the proposed agenda for the next Policy & Implementation 
Drafting Team meeting which is scheduled for Monday 24 June at 19.00 UTC. 
You'll find attached an updated version of the draft charter, based on the 
modified version that Chuck circulated earlier this week. This version 
incorporates some of the edits suggested on the mailing list to which no 
objections appear to have been made to date:

  *   Proposed additions to mission & scope suggested by Holly in modified form 
as circulated to the list
  *   Change "/" to "and" in mission item 1
  *   Added reference to the existing GNSO Operating Procedures to mission item 
1 as suggested by Anne
In addition, I addressed some none substantive comments from Chuck such as 
including links and fixed some formatting issues. Please use this version for 
any further comments / edits you may have.

With best regards,

Marika

Proposed Agenda – Policy & Implementation Drafting Team Meeting – Monday 24 
June at 19.00 UTC

  1.  Roll Call / SOI
  2.  Review latest draft of the Charter, including comments received
  3.  Discuss next steps / confirm next meeting





________________________________

For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to 
www.lewisandroca.com<http://www.lewisandroca.com/>.
Phoenix (602)262-5311



Reno (775)823-2900

Tucson (520)622-2090



Albuquerque (505)764-5400

Las Vegas (702)949-8200



Silicon Valley (650)391-1380


  This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying 
to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.

  In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that 
if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or 
written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of 
avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.



--
NOTICE: This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject 
to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If 
you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part 
of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the 
sender and delete this message immediately.