Re: [gnso-policyimpl-dt] For final review - proposed WG Charter

["WUKnoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Good morning!

I'm fine with Chuck's rewording except for the last part "... as a 
representative of the GNSO as a whole?".
I'm convinced that a discussion about the role of the council vs (and of) 
the GNSO is necessary and urgent but I wonder whether this debate may 
overload the WG mandate.
It should definitely be discussed during the coming GNSO review.

My suggestion to question 4: "Under what circumstances, if any, may  the 
GNSO Council make recommendations or state positions to the Board?"
Nevertheless I would join any wording which makes early mornings in Down 
Under more convenient :-)
Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich



-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- 
From: Holly Raiche
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 8:50 AM
To: gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Marika Konings
Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-dt] For final review - proposed WG Charter

Folks

If there is one thing I do NOT want to do, it is have another 5.00am meeting 
in two days time (particularly since I have a 1.00am call that morning!)
SOOooo

> From what I have gathered from the emails, there are really only two changes 
to the charter that Marika sent out (and thank you Marika for the very quick 
turn around)
The first is really wording - first spotted by Eduardo and then cleaned up a 
bit
The other was question 4 - and from the emails, I think people are happy to 
go with ChucK's rewording of it.
I have incorporated those changes only into a clean copy - and what I want 
from everyone is either confirmation that this is what can go forward, or 
not (and if not, please, what do you want changed - with proposed wording - 
and why)  Otherwise, if I don't hear from you, this is what we proceed with
And thank you one and all for your time, diligence and patience

Holly