<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-policyimpl-dt] For final review - proposed WG Charter
- To: Holly Raiche <h.raiche@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-dt] For final review - proposed WG Charter
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 12:59:23 +0000
Based on the list discussion I have seen, I don't think we need a call
tomorrow. I for one am willing to give Holly the discretion to review all the
discussion and make a chair decision on how to handle any remaining differences
of opinion.
Chuck
From: owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Holly Raiche
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 2:51 AM
To: gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Marika Konings
Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-dt] For final review - proposed WG Charter
Folks
If there is one thing I do NOT want to do, it is have another 5.00am meeting in
two days time (particularly since I have a 1.00am call that morning!)
SOOooo
>From what I have gathered from the emails, there are really only two changes
>to the charter that Marika sent out (and thank you Marika for the very quick
>turn around)
The first is really wording - first spotted by Eduardo and then cleaned up a bit
The other was question 4 - and from the emails, I think people are happy to go
with ChucK's rewording of it.
I have incorporated those changes only into a clean copy - and what I want from
everyone is either confirmation that this is what can go forward, or not (and
if not, please, what do you want changed - with proposed wording - and why)
Otherwise, if I don't hear from you, this is what we proceed with
And thank you one and all for your time, diligence and patience
Holly
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|