<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: REMINDER: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Input requested - Policy & Implementation Working Definitions
- To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, "gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: REMINDER: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Input requested - Policy & Implementation Working Definitions
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 15:17:01 +0000
Thank you very much for doing this Avri in your very busy schedule.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2014 9:00 AM
To: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: REMINDER: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Input requested - Policy &
Implementation Working Definitions
Hi,
Apologies for the lateness, it is obvious to me I am trying to do too many
things and need to drop a few more activities.
In any case, I have read through it and indicated a few of the places where I
take issue with these definitions.
avri
On 27-Jan-14 15:29, Marika Konings wrote:
> Reminder: please send your comments / edits, _preferably in the form
> of proposed edits or wording_, to the mailing list *at the latest by
> Wednesday 29 January.*
> *
> *
> Thanks,
> *
> *
> Marika
>
> *From:*owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
> [mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Michael
> Graham
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 22, 2014 5:06 PM
> *To:* Marika Konings; gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject:* Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Input requested - Policy &
> Implementation Working Definitions
>
> PIWG Team:
>
> I would like to echo Marika's request - it would be tremendously more
> helpful if you could provide proposed edits or language, rather than
> comments alone. Please do include comments, however, to explain the
> rationale of your changes - even if only to note "Syntax agreement",
> "correct capitalization" etc., and especially to illuminate your proposals.
>
> Finally, at the risk of repeating myself and the introduction to the
> definitions, I want to repeat that the definition sub-team's goal is
> to arrive at definitions for specific terms which enables the Work
> Group to discuss the matters before it without debating the meaning or
> significance of those terms. By doing so, we hope the Working Group's
> deliberations will be able to focus on fulfilling the Charter requests
> and produce the deliverables requested, among which we anticipate will
> be further elucidations of and discussions concerning these terms and
> their significance to Policy and Implementation.
>
> Michael R. Graham
>
> *From: *Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>
> *Date: *Wednesday, January 22, 2014 at 3:38 PM
> *To: *"gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>" <gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>>
> *Subject: *[gnso-policyimpl-wg] Input requested - Policy &
> Implementation Working Definitions
>
> Dear All,
>
> Following today's meeting, you are all strongly encouraged to send any
> comments or suggestions that you expect the sub-team to consider as it
> reviews the latest version of the working definitions document (see
> attached), _preferably in the form of proposed edits or wording_, to
> the mailing list *at the latest by Wednesday 29 January*. Following
> that the sub-team will take your comments and edits and review these
> with the aim to provide the WG with an updated version in time for its next
> meeting.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Marika
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|