<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: REMINDER: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Input requested - Policy & Implementation Working Definitions
- To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, "gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: REMINDER: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Input requested - Policy & Implementation Working Definitions
- From: "J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 09:29:42 -0800
Michael:
My one comment has to do with term "GNSO Policy Guidance". "Guidance" seems
top me to be the end result of the process; however, the definition is speaking
to a process. I would find a better term for this definition.
J. Scott
j. scott evans - associate general counsel - adobe - 408.536.5336 -
jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 08:59:56 -0500
> From: avri@xxxxxxx
> To: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: REMINDER: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Input requested - Policy &
> Implementation Working Definitions
>
> Hi,
>
> Apologies for the lateness, it is obvious to me I am trying to do too
> many things and need to drop a few more activities.
>
> In any case, I have read through it and indicated a few of the places
> where I take issue with these definitions.
>
> avri
>
>
> On 27-Jan-14 15:29, Marika Konings wrote:
> > Reminder: please send your comments / edits, _preferably in the form of
> > proposed edits or wording_, to the mailing list *at the latest by
> > Wednesday 29 January.*
> > *
> > *
> > Thanks,
> > *
> > *
> > Marika
> >
> > *From:*owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
> > [mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Michael Graham
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 22, 2014 5:06 PM
> > *To:* Marika Konings; gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
> > *Subject:* Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Input requested - Policy &
> > Implementation Working Definitions
> >
> > PIWG Team:
> >
> > I would like to echo Marika’s request — it would be tremendously more
> > helpful if you could provide proposed edits or language, rather than
> > comments alone. Please do include comments, however, to explain the
> > rationale of your changes — even if only to note “Syntax agreement”,
> > “correct capitalization" etc., and especially to illuminate your proposals.
> >
> > Finally, at the risk of repeating myself and the introduction to the
> > definitions, I want to repeat that the definition sub-team’s goal is to
> > arrive at definitions for specific terms which enables the Work Group to
> > discuss the matters before it without debating the meaning or
> > significance of those terms. By doing so, we hope the Working Group’s
> > deliberations will be able to focus on fulfilling the Charter requests
> > and produce the deliverables requested, among which we anticipate will
> > be further elucidations of and discussions concerning these terms and
> > their significance to Policy and Implementation.
> >
> > Michael R. Graham
> >
> > *From: *Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>
> > *Date: *Wednesday, January 22, 2014 at 3:38 PM
> > *To: *"gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>" <gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>>
> > *Subject: *[gnso-policyimpl-wg] Input requested - Policy &
> > Implementation Working Definitions
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> > Following today's meeting, you are all strongly encouraged to send any
> > comments or suggestions that you expect the sub-team to consider as it
> > reviews the latest version of the working definitions document (see
> > attached), _preferably in the form of proposed edits or wording_, to the
> > mailing list *at the latest by Wednesday 29 January*. Following that the
> > sub-team will take your comments and edits and review these with the aim
> > to provide the WG with an updated version in time for its next meeting.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Marika
> >
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|