Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] FW: Draft call for sub-team volunteers message

[Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hey Chuck,

I sent the email in response to Tom’s before reading this one saying that I 
thought the opposite was true. I personally feel the rewording has made it 
slightly more confusing. :)

Thanks.

Amr

On Mar 12, 2014, at 6:11 PM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I thought that at first too Tom so the chairs and vice chairs along with 
> Marika and Mary discussed it and reworded the main descriptions to better 
> reflect the differences.  There of course will be some overlap in everything 
> we do, but I personally think they are different enough that we can gain time 
> by having all three happen in parallel.  And of course they can collaborate 
> if they need to.  Assuming I am correct, the key right now is to get enough 
> volunteers for all three groups.
>  
> Chuck
>  
> From: Tom Barrett [mailto:tbarrett@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 12:50 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck; gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] FW: Draft call for sub-team volunteers 
> message
>  
> Chuck,
>  
> My sense is that there is a lot of overlap between these three sub-teams.   
> This will lead to a lot of wasted discussion within each team about whether 
> an issue is within the scope of sub-team a or b  or c.
>  
> I think it would be more productive to simply attack these question with a 
> single team.
>  
> Best regards
>  
>  
>  
> Thomas Barrett
> EnCirca, Inc.  – President
> 400 West Cummings Park, #1725
> Woburn, MA US 01801
> +1.781.942.9975 ext: 11
> +1.781.823.8911 (fax)
> +1.781.492.1315 (cell)
>  
> From: owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 5:03 PM
> To: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] FW: Draft call for sub-team volunteers message
> Importance: High
>  
> Dear All,
>  
> Now that the working definitions and working principles have (nearly) 
> completed their work, it is time to start looking ahead and focus on the next 
> stage of our work plan. As you may recall, it was proposed that the next 
> phase of work would focus on the charter questions by forming three sub-teams 
> that would work in parallel in deliberating and developing initial 
> recommendations for the full WG to review. To refresh your memories about the 
> task and expected deliveries for each of these sub-teams, please find an 
> overview attached. 
>  
> In order to determine whether this approach is still viable and the most 
> efficient way for the WG to make headway on the charter questions, you are 
> invited to indicate your interest to volunteer for one or more of these 
> sub-teams. We have observed a recent drop in attendance of the WG meetings, 
> but we are hoping this is due to the pre-ICANN meeting workload and not a 
> sign of reduced interest. Please note that it is the expectation that each 
> sub-team would at a minimum meet every two weeks (in addition to the full WG 
> meeting every two weeks). The WG is expected to review the feedback received 
> and composition of sub-teams at its F2F meeting in Singapore to decide how to 
> proceed. 
>  
> Please indicate off-list to Marika (marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx), which sub-team 
> you would like to volunteer for:
> Sub team I (Develop criteria to determine when an issue, once identified as 
> "policy", may be appropriately addressed outside a formal PDP (e.g. Through 
> Policy Guidance) & Develop a process for addressing such issues outside the 
> formal PDP)
> Sub Team II – III (Develop criteria to determine when an action should be 
> addressed through a policy process (whether through a PDP or as Policy 
> Guidance) and when it should be considered implementation & Develop a 
> framework for discussing implementation issues associated with GNSO policy 
> recommendations)
> Sub-Team IV (Develop more explicit guidelines as to how GNSO Implementation 
> Review Teams (as defined in the GNSO PDP Manual) should function and operate)
> Thanks,
>  
> Chuck & J. Scott