Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] FW: Draft call for sub-team volunteers message

[Olivier Kouami <olivierkouami@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi to all of you:
You're welcome dear Avri. We have miss you a lot, you know. You're, for
most of us, our "dearest Teacher" ;-), So ... Imagine ...

@Thomas Barret : I would like to remind to Thomas the following statement
in  : "... As you may recall, it was proposed that the
next phase of work would focus on the charter questions by forming three
sub-teams that would work in parallel in deliberating and developing
initial recommendations for the full WG to review."

So, this step of our working group is in our work plan. You must choose one
or the sub-team(s)  you would like to contribute with. Don't worry about
overlaping. It's in this tank of thoughts that the best policies coming
from the "bottom" will retain the attention of the "top", I warmly have my
hope on that.

Please, agreed my warmest greetings from Lome - Togo (West Africa).
Cheers !
-Olevie-



2014-03-12 19:03 GMT+00:00 Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>:

>
> Hi,
>
> I would pretty much go along with this, with the caveat that quick short
> term teams can be spun out anytime there was, to use Mikey's terminology -
> I think, a nut to chew on.  I.e we find a few people attacking the same
> problem in a different way, time for a team to resolved the differences.
>  Or something like that.
>
> Sorry I have been absent for 3 weeks, between various Ig meetings and
> writing and the IETF I had my hands full.  Hopefully my apologies got
> conveyed.
>
> avri
>
>
>
> On 12-Mar-14 12:50, Tom Barrett wrote:
>
>> Chuck,
>>
>> My sense is that there is a lot of overlap between these three
>> sub-teams.   This will lead to a lot of wasted discussion within each
>> team about whether an issue is within the scope of sub-team a or b  or c.
>>
>> I think it would be more productive to simply attack these question with
>> a single team.
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Thomas Barrett
>>
>> EnCirca, Inc.  - President
>>
>> 400 West Cummings Park, #1725
>>
>> Woburn, MA US 01801
>>
>> +1.781.942.9975 ext: 11
>>
>> +1.781.823.8911 (fax)
>>
>> +1.781.492.1315 (cell)
>>
>> *From:*owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Gomes, Chuck
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 11, 2014 5:03 PM
>> *To:* gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* [gnso-policyimpl-wg] FW: Draft call for sub-team volunteers
>> message
>> *Importance:* High
>>
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> Now that the working definitions and working principles have (nearly)
>> completed their work, it is time to start looking ahead and focus on the
>> next stage of our work plan. As you may recall, it was proposed that the
>> next phase of work would focus on the charter questions by forming three
>> sub-teams that would work in parallel in deliberating and developing
>> initial recommendations for the full WG to review. To refresh your
>> memories about the task and expected deliveries for each of these
>> sub-teams, please find an overview attached.
>>
>> In order to determine whether this approach is still viable and the most
>> efficient way for the WG to make headway on the charter questions, you
>> are invited to indicate your interest to volunteer for one or more of
>> these sub-teams. We have observed a recent drop in attendance of the WG
>> meetings, but we are hoping this is due to the pre-ICANN meeting
>> workload and not a sign of reduced interest. Please note that it is the
>> expectation that each sub-team would at a minimum meet every two weeks
>> (in addition to the full WG meeting every two weeks). The WG is expected
>> to review the feedback received and composition of sub-teams at its F2F
>> meeting in Singapore to decide how to proceed.
>>
>> Please indicate off-list to Marika (marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>), which sub-team you would like to
>> volunteer for:
>>
>>   * *Sub team I *(Develop criteria to determine when an issue, once
>>
>>     identified as "policy", may be appropriately addressed outside a
>>     formal PDP (e.g. Through Policy Guidance) & Develop a process for
>>     addressing such issues outside the formal PDP)
>>   * *Sub Team II - III*(Develop criteria to determine when an action
>>
>>     should be addressed through a policy process (whether through a PDP
>>     or as Policy Guidance) and when it should be considered
>>     implementation & Develop a framework for discussing implementation
>>     issues associated with GNSO policy recommendations)
>>   * *Sub-Team IV *(Develop more explicit guidelines as to how GNSO
>>
>>     Implementation Review Teams (as defined in the GNSO PDP Manual)
>>     should function and operate)
>>
>> Thanks*/,/**//*
>>
>> *//*
>>
>> */Chuck & J. Scott/*
>>
>>


-- 
Olévié (Olivier) A. A. KOUAMI
Membre de ISoc (www.isog.org) & du FOSSFA (www.fossfa.net)
DG Ets GIDA-OKTETS & CEO de INTIC4DEV (http://www.intic4dev.org)
PC Vice Chair for Francophone Africa ICANN-NCSG/NPOC (http://www.npoc.org/)
SG de ESTETIC  (http://www.estetic.tg)
Po Box : 851 - Tél.: (228) 90 98 86 50 / (228) 928 512 41 / (228) 224 999 25
Skype : olevie1 Facebook : @olivier.kouami.3 Twitter : #oleviek Lomé - Togo