[gnso-policyimpl-wg] RE: For your review - updated documents

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

After reviewing the notes from the WG meeting this week as contained in the
July 17 WG discussion document, I want to add the following.

 

In the WG Discussion column for question c under D 9 (What lessons can be
learned from past experience?), the notes say: 

.        "Council is composed of representatives of SG/C - unless these
oppose, the Council is able to speak on behalf of the Council

.        Question would be what would be the voting threshold to speak on
behalf of the GNSO - currently simple majority applies to all decisions that
do not relate to PDP votes"

 

Communications from the Council that are on behalf of just the Council
should always be clearly differentiated from communications  from the
Council on behalf of the GNSO.

 

Chuck

 

From: owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 6:48 AM
To: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] For your review - updated documents

 

Dear All,

 

Following yesterday's meeting, please find attached the updated Deliverable
I template including the notes from our discussion.

 

Also attached is the summary document for Deliverable I-A which was also
circulated last week. For those of you that did not have an opportunity yet,
please review this document and share with the mailing list if you have any
further comments / proposed edits.

 

Best regards,

 

Marika

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature