[gnso-policyimpl-wg] For your review - Notes from WG Discussion on GNSO Processes Flow Charts

[Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear WG members,

Attached please find Discussion Notes from the Wednesday call, in relation
to the five questions specific to the draft GNSO Processes Flow Charts (see
email below for the questions). As the Wednesday discussion was concentrated
on these questions, we thought the notes might be easier to review if
compiled in the form of a separate document rather than added on to the
Deliverable I document.

We will be circulating an updated version of the GNSO Processes Flow Chart
soon, revised to reflect the Wednesday discussion. As a result, Deliverable
I remains largely unchanged, save for the inclusion of all three SO/AC input
responses, so we have not attached it to this email to avoid cluttering up
your inboxes. Please let me know if you¹d like a copy nonetheless.

Thanks and cheers
Mary

Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx


From:  Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:  Tuesday, July 29, 2014 at 5:16 PM
To:  <gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:  Proposed agenda for WG meeting on 30 July

> Dear WG members,
> 
> The proposed agenda for the next WG meeting on Wednesday 30 July is as
> follows:
> 
> 1. Roll Call /Updates to SOI
> 2. Review draft GNSO Processes flow charts (updated and circulated on 24 July)
> 3. Continue review of Deliverable I ­ item E(a), E(b) and E(c) (updated and
> circulated on 24 July)
> 4. Review of Deliverable I Item F (SG/C/SO/AC input received) ­ form small
> team to review comments and draft response?
> 5. Confirm next steps / next meeting
> For Agenda Item #2, please review the following questions that Marika had
> circulated on 24 July. We hope they will be useful as you discuss the draft
> GNSO Processes flow chart:
> * Do the two draft processes (Policy Guidance Process and Policy Input
> Processes) align with the WG's thinking and discussions to date? If not, what
> other processes / elements would need to be explored?
> * What voting thresholds should be associated with initiating a Policy
> Guidance Process or alike, as well as adoption of recommendations?
> * Should Board consideration of recommendations following a Policy Guidance
> Process (or similar) follow the same process as is currently used for PDP
> recommendations?
> * Should the WG explore a Policy Guidance Process or similar to also be
> available to develop modified consensus policy recommendations in those
> limited circumstances in which either limited changes need to be made
> following implementation of a consensus policy (based on data gathered or
> practical experience) or where additional scoping information is already
> available based on previous efforts?
> * (not necessarily for Deliverable I, but to keep in mind) How do these
> processes align with a possible process that would need to be available during
> implementation of policy recommendations and that could be invoked by
> Implementation Review Teams/GNSO Council in case policy/implementation issues
> are identified that need further consideration by the broader community?
> The updated documents that were circulated on 24 July have been uploaded to
> the WG wiki space: https://community.icann.org/x/K77hAg and will, as usual,
> also be made available in the Adobe Connect room for the meeting.
> 
> Thanks and cheers
> Mary
> 
> Mary Wong
> Senior Policy Director
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
> Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
> Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx
>

Attachment: PIWG Notes on GNSO Processes Flowcharts 30 July.docx
Description: Microsoft Office

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature