ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-policyimpl-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-policyimpl-wg] RE: Follow up from the call today: information about GNSO Council voting thresholds and other relevant matters

  • To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] RE: Follow up from the call today: information about GNSO Council voting thresholds and other relevant matters
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 17:23:15 +0000

Thanks for following up on this Mary.  There is one more link that I think
WG members find useful, especially as we consider the requirements of Board
approval of recommendations for any of the three processes:  Section 9 of
Bylaws Annex A (Board Approval Processes - for GNSO PDP recommendations):
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/bylaws-2012-02-25-en#AnnexA .  I
pasted it below.

 

Chuck

 

"The Board will meet to discuss the GNSO Council recommendation as soon as
feasible, but preferably not later than the second meeting after receipt of
the Board Report from the Staff Manager. Board deliberation on the PDP
Recommendations contained within the Recommendations Report shall proceed as
follows:

a. Any PDP Recommendations approved by a GNSO Supermajority Vote shall be
adopted by the Board unless, by a vote of more than two-thirds (2/3) of the
Board, the Board determines that such policy is not in the best interests of
the ICANN community or ICANN. If the GNSO Council recommendation was
approved by less than a GNSO Supermajority Vote, a majority vote of the
Board will be sufficient to determine that such policy is not in the best
interests of the ICANN community or ICANN.

b. In the event that the Board determines, in accordance with paragraph a
above, that the policy recommended by a GNSO Supermajority Vote or less than
a GNSO Supermajority vote is not in the best interests of the ICANN
community or ICANN (the Corporation), the Board shall (i) articulate the
reasons for its determination in a report to the Council (the "Board
Statement"); and (ii) submit the Board Statement to the Council.

c. The Council shall review the Board Statement for discussion with the
Board as soon as feasible after the Council's receipt of the Board
Statement. The Board shall determine the method (e.g., by teleconference,
e-mail, or otherwise) by which the Council and Board will discuss the Board
Statement.

d. At the conclusion of the Council and Board discussions, the Council shall
meet to affirm or modify its recommendation, and communicate that conclusion
(the "Supplemental Recommendation") to the Board, including an explanation
for the then-current recommendation. In the event that the Council is able
to reach a GNSO Supermajority Vote on the Supplemental Recommendation, the
Board shall adopt the recommendation unless more than two-thirds (2/3) of
the Board determines that such policy is not in the interests of the ICANN
community or ICANN. For any Supplemental Recommendation approved by less
than a GNSO Supermajority Vote, a majority vote of the Board shall be
sufficient to determine that the policy in the Supplemental Recommendation
is not in the best interest of the ICANN community or ICANN."

 

From: owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mary Wong
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 6:46 PM
To: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Follow up from the call today: information
about GNSO Council voting thresholds and other relevant matters

 

Dear all,

 

Please find below some links to information about GNSO Council voting
thresholds and other matters which we thought might be relevant in light of
the discussions from earlier today.

*       Voting thresholds for all GNSO Council actions, including the
initiation of a PDP within scope and a PDP not within scope:
http://gnso.icann.org/council/appendix-1-gnso-council-voting-results-25oct13
-en.pdf
*       The GNSO's PDP Manual, which describes the initiation of a PDP,
timelines and outcomes:
http://gnso.icann.org/council/annex-2-pdp-manual-26mar14-en.pdf (to be read
in conjunction with Annex A of the ICANN Bylaws, which sets out the
framework for the GNSO PDP:
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/bylaws-2012-02-25-en#AnnexA)
*       A visually-friendly graphic representation of the GNSO PDP:
http://gnso.icann.org/en/basics/consensus-policy/pdp
*       List of current Consensus Policies:
http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/consensus-policies

I hope these are useful. Please do not hesitate to let Marika or me know if
you have any other questions.

 

Thanks and cheers

Mary

 

Mary Wong

Senior Policy Director

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)

Telephone: +1 603 574 4892

Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx

 

 

 

 

 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy