<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Revised Email Message to Request Feedback regarding the flow charts
- To: "gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Revised Email Message to Request Feedback regarding the flow charts
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:31:41 -0400
Hi,
Seems a good note.
avri
On 21-Aug-14 09:50, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> Thank you very much Marika. I like very much what you did, accepted all
> the edits, yours and mine, and created the attached clean version 6 that
> is attached.
>
>
>
> ALL: Please use clean version 6 to enter any new edits so it is easier
> for everyone to see them.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:*Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 21, 2014 3:25 AM
> *To:* Gomes, Chuck; gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Revised Email Message to Request
> Feedback regarding the flow charts
> *Importance:* High
>
>
>
> Thanks, Chuck. Please find a couple of suggested edits in the version
> attached. One of my suggestions is to remove the specific reference to
> voting thresholds as I think the orange boxes are more about the process
> for initiation / adoption than just the voting thresholds.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Marika
>
>
>
> *From: *<Gomes>, Chuck Gomes <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> *Date: *Wednesday 20 August 2014 23:04
> *To: *"gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>" <gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>>
> *Subject: *[gnso-policyimpl-wg] Revised Email Message to Request
> Feedback regarding the flow charts
>
>
>
> Attached are redline and clean versions of a revised email template
> requesting feedback about the flowcharts showing the two new GNSO
> processes under consideration. Please use the clear version to propose
> edits.
>
>
>
> Edits and comments are needed by end of the day on Monday, 25 August.
> Of course they are welcome sooner than that; that will allow time for
> discussion of proposed edits on the list.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
> “This message (including any attachments) is intended only for
> the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed,
> and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary,
> privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under
> applicable law or may be constituted as attorney work product.
> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
> communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
> this message in error, notify sender immediately and delete
> this message immediately.”
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|