<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-policyimpl-wg] RE: Initial Report survey for review
- To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, "Michael Graham (ELCA)" <migraham@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] RE: Initial Report survey for review
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 16:36:20 +0000
What you did Marika seemed fine to me. @ Michael - I don't recall a question
for which a sliding scale would work better.
Chuck
From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 10:59 AM
To: Michael Graham (ELCA); Gomes, Chuck; gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Initial Report survey for review
Building the survey, I was not sure how much value there would be in the
sliding scale model and as such, the proposed responses are now 'yes', 'yes,
provided that the conditions outlined below are met', 'no' and 'no opinion' as
I think that may be provide more relevant feedback than 60% support or 75%
support. But if you think it should be structured differently, please feel free
to suggest.
Best regards,
Marika
From: "Michael Graham (ELCA)"
<migraham@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:migraham@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Friday 16 January 2015 10:50
To: Chuck Gomes <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>, Marika
Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>,
"gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>"
<gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: RE: Initial Report survey for review
Chuck/Marika:
Wasn't there another question for which we discussed having a sliding scale?
Michael R. Graham
Senior Corporate Counsel, Intellectual Property
Expedia Legal & Corporate Affairs
T +1 425.679.4330 | F +1 425.679.7251
M +1 425.241.1459
Expedia, Inc.
333 108th Avenue NE | Bellevue | WA 98004
MiGraham@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:MiGraham@xxxxxxxxxxx>
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message may contain private,
confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the intended
recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this message by others is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please (i) contact
the sender immediately; and (ii) permanently delete the original and any copies
of the message including file attachments. Thank you for your cooperation.
From:
owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 7:03 AM
To: Marika Konings;
gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] RE: Initial Report survey for review
Here is my feedback.
Chuck
From:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 6:54 AM
To: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Initial Report survey for review
Dear All,
As discussed, please find hereby the link to the preview of the proposed survey
on the Initial Report:
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?PREVIEW_MODE=DO_NOT_USE_THIS_LINK_FOR_COLLECTION&sm=FDx%2fDFr81UdLCcKYuB5Fh%2fTpvz%2baPTDCg%2bFSWSCUqug%3d.
Note, as the survey is not open yet, you can fill in any fields you like to
see how the survey works without this information being recorded. I've also
attached a pdf version.
Please provide any comments / edits you may have by Monday 19 January at 15.00
UTC at the latest. I'm still working on the template and hope to be able to
share that with you later today.
Best regards,
Marika
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|