ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-policyimpl-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Updated Public Comment Review Tool and a note for next week

  • Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Updated Public Comment Review Tool and a note for next week
  • From: Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 14:33:00 +0000

Thanks, Amr ­ if there is no objection, we will include the textual change
suggested by the RySG in the appropriate column of row 4.9 as a WG
recommendation for adoption.

Cheers
Mary

Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx




From:  Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:  Friday, March 27, 2015 at 07:56
To:  Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc:  "gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:  Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Updated Public Comment Review Tool and a
note for next week

> Hi, and thanks for the updated document Mary.
> 
> I just wanted to reiterate my view on the RySG input on row 4.9 of the review
> tool table.
> 
> I believe the change in text suggested by the RySG to be quite a good one.
> Seems to me that it does a better job of clarifying the intent of the
> principle. The idea here was not to give staff the ability to make transparent
> changes to a proposed implementation (provided that they do not affect the
> intent of the policy recommendation), but rather to require that those changes
> meet both criteria; not changing the intent of policy recommendations in
> addition to being transparently made. The change in language suggested by the
> RySG, to me, is constructive towards that end.
> 
> I bring this up, because although the WG response appears to be ³noted², there
> is no recommended action to make the suggested change. We did not agree to
> making this change on our last call, but I think it is something worth
> considering.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Amr
> 
> On Mar 27, 2015, at 12:06 AM, Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Dear WG members,
>> 
>> Please find attached an updated version of the Public Comment Review Tool,
>> reflecting WG comments from the WG call yesterday. For the information of
>> those who were not able to join the call, we covered more comments related to
>> Section 4 of the Initial Report, on the Policy & Implementation Principles,
>> up to comment #4.14 (with edits and WG notes shown in blue).
>> 
>> For the next call, please be sure to review the remaining comments starting
>> from #4.15 so that we can continue to make timely progress with our review of
>> all the comments we received on our Initial Report. For your convenience, the
>> survey which commentators filled out and on which the Tool was based can be
>> found here: 
>> http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/policy-implementation/pi-wg-initial-report-su
>> rvey-19jan15-en.pdf, and our full Initial Report here:
>> http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/policy-implementation/pi-wg-initial-recommend
>> ations-19jan15-en.pdf.
>> 
>> Thanks and cheers
>> Mary
>> 
>> Mary Wong
>> Senior Policy Director
>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
>> Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
>> Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx
>> 
>> 
>> <Public comment revi#332AAF0.doc>
> 


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy