ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-policyimpl-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] RE: Attendance and Recording Policy and Implementation WG meeting - 29 April 2015

  • To: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] RE: Attendance and Recording Policy and Implementation WG meeting - 29 April 2015
  • From: Olévié Kouami <olivierkouami@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 3 May 2015 06:34:09 +0000

Hi all,

My apologies also for being unable to attend the latest meetings.
listen the mp3.

Keep up the great work !
Cheers !
-Olévié-


2015-05-01 1:00 GMT+00:00 Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>:

>  Thanks everyone.  My apologies for not being able to attend yesterday
> .   I will listen to the mp3.  I believe that both Greg and I have an IPC
> meeting at INTA on May 6 at the time the call is scheduled.
>
> Anne
>
>
>
>   *Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel*
>
> *Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | *
>
> *One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611*
>
> *(T) 520.629.4428 <520.629.4428> | (F) 520.879.4725 <520.879.4725>*
>
> *AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>** | www.LRRLaw.com
> <http://www.lrrlaw.com/>*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Terri Agnew
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 29, 2015 8:06 PM
> *To:* gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> *Cc:* gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Attendance and Recording Policy and
> Implementation WG meeting - 29 April 2015
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> The next Policy and Implementation Working Group teleconference is
> scheduled *next week on Wednesday 06 May 2015 at 19:00 UTC for 90
> minutes.*
>
>
>
> Please find the MP3 recording for the Policy and Implementation Working
> group call held on Wednesday 29 April 2015 at 19:00 UTC at:
> http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-policy-implementation-29apr15-en.mp3
>
>
>
> On page:
>
> http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#apr
>
>
>
> The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO
> Master Calendar page:
>
> http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/
>
>
>
> *Attendees:*
>
> Amr Elsadr - NCUC
>
> Alan Greenberg-ALAC
>
> Chuck Gomes - RySG
>
> Avri Doria - NCSG
>
> Greg Shatan - IPC
>
> Cheryl Langdon-Orr - At-Large
>
> Michael Graham - IPC
>
>
>
> *Apologies:*
>
> J.Scott Evans - BC
>
>
>
> *ICANN staff:*
>
> Marika Konings
>
> Mary Wong
>
> Amy Bivins
>
> Karen Lentz
>
> Steve Chan
>
> Berry Cobb
>
> Terri Agnew
>
>
>
> ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list **
>
>
>
>  Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/y1V-Ag
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> Terri Agnew
>
>
>
> *Adobe Chat Transcript for Wednesday 29 April 2015*
>
>
>
>   Terri Agnew:Welcome to the Policy & Implementation WG meeting of 29
> April 2015
>
>   Amr Elsadr:Hi there. I must be earlier than I thought I was today. :)
>
>   Amr Elsadr::)
>
>   Amr Elsadr:Thanks. :)
>
>   Greg Shatan:I just sent an email to the list on the question regarding
> no new obligations....
>
>   Greg Shatan:Sorry not to get it out earlier....
>
>   Alan Greenberg:Only 5 hours today - peice of cake!
>
>   Marika Konings:I've pasted Mary's language on the right hand side as it
> went across a couple of pages (for those that want to read it again)
>
>   Marika Konings:Our definition in the Initial Report is: A Policy
> established (1) pursuant to the procedure and required minimum elements set
> forth in ICANN's Bylaws, and (2) covering those topics listed in Section
> 1.2 of the consensus policies and temporary policies specification of the
> 2013 RAA (see Annex I) or the relevant sections in the gTLD registry
> agreements (see Annex II). GNSO Consensus Policies, adopted following the
> outlined procedures, are applicable and enforceable on contracted parties
> as of the implementation effective date.
>
>   Greg Shatan:also please fix spelling of Consensus...
>
>   Greg Shatan:or define "Consenus".
>
>   Greg Shatan:I feel better already.
>
>   Amr Elsadr:@Alan: What purpose would that serve?
>
>   Greg Shatan:Definition of Policy: Something that would be Implementation
> if you agreed with it.
>
>   Greg Shatan:I jest.
>
>   Amr Elsadr:@Chuck: You've covered my concern pretty well. Thanks.
>
>   Marika Konings:We haven't used it yet as we are still waiting for a
> response from the Board ;-)
>
>   Marika Konings:Yes, we'll make sure that a redline version will be
> available.
>
>   Greg Shatan:Alan Greenberg, MS Word Ninja.
>
>   Greg Shatan:or should I say .ninja?
>
>   Avri Doria:not so much as different world, but a different frame of
> reference.
>
>   Terri Agnew:Welcome Michael Graham
>
>   Greg Shatan:WRT the example in Q10.2, the GAC sent a letter published
> today on the country/territory release issue, asking that RSEPs be parked
> until the GAC can prepare a database and related processes.
>
>   Amr Elsadr:If I recall correctly, the board deals with GNSO
> recommendations differently depending on the consensus levels of the GNSO
> Council.
>
>   Amr Elsadr:I need a refresher on that.
>
>   Mary Wong:@Amr, you're prob referring to Annex A of the Bylaws - on
> Board adoption of PDP recommendations
>
>   Amr Elsadr:Yes. I'll look it up. I should know this.
>
>   Amr Elsadr:Thanks for that Alan.
>
>   Greg Shatan:For the record, I am not objecting.
>
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr:yup makes sense to me
>
>   Avri Doria:nd even John Poole agrees.
>
>   Amr Elsadr::)
>
>   Avri Doria:IPC and Poole
>
>   Amr Elsadr:To be honest, I'm not entirely sure, but IRT membership is
> normally limited to members of the original PDP WG.
>
>   Amr Elsadr:Thanks Marika.
>
>   Greg Shatan:We are not in the same poole....
>
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr:that may br the case  @Marika but as were checking
> with him any way ... ... .. my as well ask
>
>   Amr Elsadr:We should probably ask him to clarify this.
>
>   Greg Shatan:Slow on the trigger....
>
>   Amr Elsadr:@Marika: But that would make this different from how it
> happens on a WG. Why the differentiation?
>
>   Marika Konings:Can an individual raise an issue to the Council? I
> believe it also requires at least more than one person - but I would need
> to double check.
>
>   Amr Elsadr:I'm pretty sure there's not requirement for this.
>
>   Amr Elsadr:*no requirement.
>
>   Amr Elsadr:@Chuck: Sure.
>
>   Avri Doria:an individual can make a motion.  granted it needs
> seconding.  but i beleive that yes a a single person can bring up an issue.
>
>   Avri Doria:indivudlas still have some say.
>
>   Marika Konings:Agree with Chuck - I don't think there is any change to
> the liaison relationship.
>
>   Amr Elsadr:There was no intent on changing the role of the liaison on my
> part.
>
>   Avri Doria:expect to be treated as trouble makers, more likely
>
>   Avri Doria:without ever really causing any trouble.
>
>   Amr Elsadr:Although a minority statement would be dealt with differently
> on an IRT.
>
>   Amr Elsadr:Alan is correct.
>
>   Avri Doria:to council if there is a problem
>
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr:same here Avri  so let's be explicit
>
>   Karen Lentz:agree re: public comment step
>
>   Berry Cobb:Yes, the PC from an IRT is not so much about the "plan"
> itself, but for how CPs would implement, the PED, and the proposed policy
> language.
>
>   Amr Elsadr:@Berry: PED?
>
>   Berry Cobb:Policy Effective Date
>
>   Amr Elsadr:Thnx. :)
>
>   Marika Konings:and there is also the GNSO liaison
>
>   Karen Lentz:of course the staff will communicate also
>
>   Avri Doria:and if there is doubt, the council can get invovled.
>
>   Greg Shatan:No stronger than a strong presumption....
>
>   Amr Elsadr:@Marika: I'd be happy if staff want to take this up. :D
>
>   Mary Wong::)
>
>   Amr Elsadr:Gives me more time to work on my thesis.
>
>   Avri Doria:makes sense, it is a roles and repsonsiblities type of
> question
>
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr:LOL
>
>   Mary Wong:Typo for WG?
>
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr:groan
>
>   Amr Elsadr:Sure. We can do this on-list.
>
>   Greg Shatan:I hope IPC got a "Noted and thanks"!
>
>   Mary Wong:A surgically precise thanks, right, Greg?
>
>   Marika Konings:You did, Greg ;-)
>
>   Greg Shatan:Thanks!  :-)
>
>   Amr Elsadr:I won't make the call in two weeks, so will try to wrap up my
> tasks on-list.
>
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr:valid concern  CHuck
>
>   Marika Konings:@Chuck - I didn't interpret it that way, but just wanted
> to give an indication as to when we expect to have an updated version
> available which may faciliate planning.
>
>   Greg Shatan:I will be unavailable next week anyway, due to the INTA
> (International Trademark Association) meeting in San Diego.
>
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr:you would need an agreement call  any way  so why nit
> hold the one next week
>
>   Greg Shatan:I expect that Michael, Anne and J Scott will also be
> unavailable then, to9o.
>
>   Alan Greenberg:@Greg, perfect opportunity to put something over on the
> IPC!
>
>   Greg Shatan:We'll be watching you!
>
>   Alan Greenberg:No you won't! You will be at INTA!
>
>   Greg Shatan:We have our ways....
>
>   Mary Wong:What a way to end the meeting, Alan!!!
>
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr:Thanks all Bye for now...
>
>   Greg Shatan:Goodbye, old hands!!
>
>   Amr Elsadr:Thanks all. Bye.
>
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr:Bye
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
>



-- 
Olévié Ayaovi Agbenyo KOUAMI
Responsable du Projet CERGI Education
Directeur-Adjoint de KT Technologies Informatiques sarl
SG de ESTETIC  - Association Togolaise des professionnels des TIC (
http://www.estetic.tg)
ICANN-NPOC Communications Committee Chair (http://www.icann.org/ et
http://www.npoc.org/)
Membre du FOSSFA (www.fossfa.net) et Membre de de Internet Society (
www.isoc.org)
BP : 851 - Tél.: (228) 90 98 86 50 / (228) 98 43 27 72
Skype : olevie1 FB : @olivier.kouami.3 Twitter : #oleviek Lomé - Togo

GIF image



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy