Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] RE: Consensus Call for Final Policy & Implementation WG Recommendations

[Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx>]

I'm happy too :-)


*Cheryl Langdon-O**rr ...  *(CLO)

about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr
[image: Cheryl Langdon-Orr on about.me]
  <http://about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr>


On 28 May 2015 at 06:49, J. Scott Evans <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ditto.
>
>
> *j. scott evans - associate general counsel - adobe - 408.536.5336 -
> jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx>*
>
> ------------------------------
> From: AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx; gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> CC: jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx; gregshatanipc@xxxxxxxxx; migraham@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] RE: Consensus Call for Final Policy &
> Implementation WG Recommendations
> Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 18:18:14 +0000
>
>
>  I certainly support.  Excellent work everyone and special kudos to Chuck
> and Marika and Mary!  Looking forward to the discussion at Council…
>
> Anne
>
>
>
>   *Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel*
>
> *Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | *
>
> *One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611*
>
> *(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725*
>
> *AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>** | www.LRRLaw.com
> <http://www.lrrlaw.com/>*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Gomes, Chuck
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 26, 2015 3:46 PM
> *To:* gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Consensus Call for Final Policy &
> Implementation WG Recommendations
> *Importance:* High
>
>
>
> As co-chairs of the Policy & Implementation WG, J. Scott and I have
> reached the following conclusions:
>
> 1.       All of the public comments have been reviewed and discussed by
> the WG and amendments made to the Initial Report as agreed to by the WG.
>
> 2.       There have been no objections to the Final Report communicated
> on the WG list since Marika sent the latest redline version of the Final
> Report to the WG list on 21 May with a response deadline of Tuesday 26
> May at 14.00 UTC.
>
> 3.       There is full consensus of the WG on the Final Report as
> attached in clean and redline versions, noting that the redline version
> highlights all edits made to the Initial Report that was published for
> public comment in March 2015 (
> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/policy-implementation-2015-01-19-en
> ).
>
>
>
> All WG participants have until 23:59 UTC on Friday, 29 May, 2015 to object
> to the ‘full consensus’ call by the co-chairs.  If anyone objects, please
> explain your reasons.  If no one objects in the allotted time, the report
> will be sent by our Council Liaison Amr to the GNSO Council for their
> action along with a draft motion for its approval.
>
>
>
> If anyone has any questions, please feel free to ask.
>
>
>
> Thanks to everyone for helping us get to this point.
>
>
>
> Chuck Gomes
>
>
>
>
> “This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of
> the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
> information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and
> exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as
> attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are
> hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of
> this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> message in error, notify sender immediately and delete this message
> immediately.”
>
> ------------------------------
>
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
>