Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Consensus Call for Final Policy & Implementation WG Recommendations

[Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Same here. Thanks to everyone for all the hard work in getting this done.

Amr

On May 28, 2015, at 4:01 AM, Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm happy too :-)
> 
> 
> Cheryl Langdon-Orr ...  (CLO)
> 
> about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr
> 
>  
>  
> 
> On 28 May 2015 at 06:49, J. Scott Evans <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ditto.
> 
> 
> j. scott evans - associate general counsel - adobe - 408.536.5336 - 
> jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> From: AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx; gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> CC: jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx; gregshatanipc@xxxxxxxxx; migraham@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] RE: Consensus Call for Final Policy & 
> Implementation WG Recommendations
> Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 18:18:14 +0000
> 
> 
> I certainly support.  Excellent work everyone and special kudos to Chuck and 
> Marika and Mary!  Looking forward to the discussion at Council…
> 
> Anne
> 
>  
> <image001.gif>
> 
> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel
> 
> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
> 
> One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
> 
> (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
> 
> AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx | www.LRRLaw.com
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> From: owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 3:46 PM
> To: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Consensus Call for Final Policy & 
> Implementation WG Recommendations
> Importance: High
> 
>  
> As co-chairs of the Policy & Implementation WG, J. Scott and I have reached 
> the following conclusions:
> 
> 1.       All of the public comments have been reviewed and discussed by the 
> WG and amendments made to the Initial Report as agreed to by the WG.
> 
> 2.       There have been no objections to the Final Report communicated on 
> the WG list since Marika sent the latest redline version of the Final Report 
> to the WG list on 21 May with a response deadline of Tuesday 26 May at 14.00 
> UTC.
> 
> 3.       There is full consensus of the WG on the Final Report as attached in 
> clean and redline versions, noting that the redline version highlights all 
> edits made to the Initial Report that was published for public comment in 
> March 2015 
> (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/policy-implementation-2015-01-19-en ).
> 
>  
> All WG participants have until 23:59 UTC on Friday, 29 May, 2015 to object to 
> the ‘full consensus’ call by the co-chairs.  If anyone objects, please 
> explain your reasons.  If no one objects in the allotted time, the report 
> will be sent by our Council Liaison Amr to the GNSO Council for their action 
> along with a draft motion for its approval.
> 
>  
> If anyone has any questions, please feel free to ask.
> 
>  
> Thanks to everyone for helping us get to this point.
> 
>  
> Chuck Gomes
> 
>  
>  
> “This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the 
> individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information 
> that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and exempt from 
> disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as attorney work 
> product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
> any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is 
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, notify 
> sender immediately and delete this message immediately.”
> 
> 
> 
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the 
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this 
> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or 
> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended 
> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any 
> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and 
> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic 
> Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. 
>