[gnso-ppsc-pdp] RE: Nomination of Jeff Neuman as PDPT Chair

["Diaz, Paul" <pdiaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I propose a motion that the first order of business at the PDPT's next
meeting (still TBD) shall be to nominate Jeff Neuman as the PDPT chair.
Do I have a second?

 

________________________________

From: owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Liz Williams
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 9:17 AM
To: James M. Bladel
Cc: J. Scott Evans; Neuman,Jeff; Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] FW: Still working to find a meeting time

 

Someone propose a motion and second it as the first order of business
for the proposed next meeting.  We can cut down on email discussion.

 

Liz

....

Liz Williams

+44 1963 364 380 tel

+44 7824 8777 57 mob

 






 

On 12 Mar 2009, at 12:44, James M. Bladel wrote:





 

J. Scott and Group:

 

I am in total agreement with this, and also support Jeff as permanent

chair of this WG.

 

Regards--

 

J.

 

 

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] FW: Still working to find a meeting time

From: "J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Wed, March 11, 2009 5:17 pm

To: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>, Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx

 

On the issue of a permanent Chair, I would like to publicly go on the

record in support of Jeff.  Jeff has, so far, done an incredible job of

moving this process forward in a neutral and transparent manner.  I

realize that there was some concern raised in Mexico City about a

perception issue due to perceived conflicts of interest.  Frankly, I

think that label could apply to almost everyone who is an ACTIVE

participant in ICANN working groups.  If this model is going to work, we

have to have neutral chairs (even though they may have a stake in the

outcome).  If this concept is flawed, I would argue we need to know

sooner rather than later.  I trust that Jeff will continue to be neutral

and impartial (as I hope to be in the WGWT); however, if he cannot be

(which I sincerely doubt) then we need to know that this concept is

flawed NOW, before we get too far down the road with these improvements.

 

In short, I know I don't have a vote, but I would encourage each of you

to strongly consider Jeff as the Chair of the PDPWT.

 

Kind regards.

 

J. Scott Evans

 

j. scott evans | senior legal director, global brand & trademark |

Yahoo! Inc. | evansj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | 408.349.1385

 

 

From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>

To: Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx

Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 1:51:45 PM

Subject: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] FW: Still working to find a meeting time

 

 

 All,

 

 I had hoped to have a meeting scheduled for this week to continue the

work we started, but it looks like due to a number of conflicts, this

probably will not happen.  Margie/Marika/Glen - can you send out a

doodle for next week.   If we could try different times on Tuesday and

Thursday (the 16th and 18th).  We will be circulating around the notes

from the meeting last week as well in the next day or so.   Finally,

please keep in mind that we need to elect a permanent chair.  At this

point in time no one other than me has come forward, but if anyone else

is interested, please let the group know before the meeting.

 

 Thanks for your patience and sorry for the delay.

 

 Best regards,

 

 Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.: NeuStar, Inc.

 Vice President, Law & Policy 

 46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166

 [ T ] +1 571 434 5772 [ M ] +1 202 549 5079  [ F ] +1 703 738-7965 [ E

] jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx [ W ] www.neustar.biz  

 

 

 

The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for

the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential

and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you

have received this e-mail message in error and any review,

dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly

prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please

notify us immediately and delete the original message.