<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] RE: Nomination of Jeff Neuman as PDPT Chair
- To: <Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] RE: Nomination of Jeff Neuman as PDPT Chair
- From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:05:03 -0400
I second.
Kristina
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Diaz, Paul
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 10:03 AM
To: Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Neuman,Jeff; Liz Williams; J. Scott Evans
Subject: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] RE: Nomination of Jeff Neuman as PDPT
Chair
I propose a motion that the first order of business at the
PDPT's next meeting (still TBD) shall be to nominate Jeff Neuman as the
PDPT chair. Do I have a second?
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Liz Williams
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 9:17 AM
To: James M. Bladel
Cc: J. Scott Evans; Neuman,Jeff; Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] FW: Still working to find a meeting
time
Someone propose a motion and second it as the first order of
business for the proposed next meeting. We can cut down on email
discussion.
Liz
....
Liz Williams
+44 1963 364 380 tel
+44 7824 8777 57 mob
On 12 Mar 2009, at 12:44, James M. Bladel wrote:
J. Scott and Group:
I am in total agreement with this, and also support Jeff as
permanent
chair of this WG.
Regards--
J.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] FW: Still working to find a meeting
time
From: "J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, March 11, 2009 5:17 pm
To: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>,
Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
On the issue of a permanent Chair, I would like to publicly go
on the
record in support of Jeff. Jeff has, so far, done an incredible
job of
moving this process forward in a neutral and transparent manner.
I
realize that there was some concern raised in Mexico City about
a
perception issue due to perceived conflicts of interest.
Frankly, I
think that label could apply to almost everyone who is an ACTIVE
participant in ICANN working groups. If this model is going to
work, we
have to have neutral chairs (even though they may have a stake
in the
outcome). If this concept is flawed, I would argue we need to
know
sooner rather than later. I trust that Jeff will continue to be
neutral
and impartial (as I hope to be in the WGWT); however, if he
cannot be
(which I sincerely doubt) then we need to know that this concept
is
flawed NOW, before we get too far down the road with these
improvements.
In short, I know I don't have a vote, but I would encourage each
of you
to strongly consider Jeff as the Chair of the PDPWT.
Kind regards.
J. Scott Evans
j. scott evans | senior legal director, global brand & trademark
|
Yahoo! Inc. | evansj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | 408.349.1385
From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 1:51:45 PM
Subject: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] FW: Still working to find a meeting
time
All,
I had hoped to have a meeting scheduled for this week to
continue the
work we started, but it looks like due to a number of conflicts,
this
probably will not happen. Margie/Marika/Glen - can you send out
a
doodle for next week. If we could try different times on
Tuesday and
Thursday (the 16th and 18th). We will be circulating around the
notes
from the meeting last week as well in the next day or so.
Finally,
please keep in mind that we need to elect a permanent chair. At
this
point in time no one other than me has come forward, but if
anyone else
is interested, please let the group know before the meeting.
Thanks for your patience and sorry for the delay.
Best regards,
Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.: NeuStar, Inc.
Vice President, Law & Policy
46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166
[ T ] +1 571 434 5772 [ M ] +1 202 549 5079 [ F ] +1 703
738-7965 [ E
] jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx [ W ] www.neustar.biz
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended
only for
the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain
confidential
and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient you
have received this e-mail message in error and any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is
strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please
notify us immediately and delete the original message.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|