RE: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] RE: Nomination of Jeff Neuman as PDPT Chair

["Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Paul, Kristina and everyone else for your support.  We will put
this as the first item on the agenda and have a consensus call.  I will
ask ICANN staff to lead that initial part of the meeting.

 

Just a reminder that Marika sent out a Doddle for a meeting next Tuesday
or Thursday.  Please make sure you respond.  It looks like there will
not be a time when everyone can attend, but we will pick the time that
works for the most amount of people.


Thanks again everyone. 

 

Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.: NeuStar, Inc.
Vice President, Law & Policy 



________________________________

The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential
and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you
have received this e-mail message in error and any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately and delete the original message.

 

 

From: owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 10:05 AM
To: Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] RE: Nomination of Jeff Neuman as PDPT Chair

 

I second.

 

Kristina

         

________________________________

        From: owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Diaz, Paul
        Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 10:03 AM
        To: Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
        Cc: Neuman,Jeff; Liz Williams; J. Scott Evans
        Subject: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] RE: Nomination of Jeff Neuman as PDPT
Chair

        I propose a motion that the first order of business at the
PDPT's next meeting (still TBD) shall be to nominate Jeff Neuman as the
PDPT chair.  Do I have a second?

         

________________________________

        From: owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Liz Williams
        Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 9:17 AM
        To: James M. Bladel
        Cc: J. Scott Evans; Neuman,Jeff; Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] FW: Still working to find a meeting
time

         

        Someone propose a motion and second it as the first order of
business for the proposed next meeting.  We can cut down on email
discussion.

         

        Liz

        ....

        Liz Williams

        +44 1963 364 380 tel

        +44 7824 8777 57 mob

         

        
        
        
        
        

         

        On 12 Mar 2009, at 12:44, James M. Bladel wrote:

         

         

        J. Scott and Group:

         

        I am in total agreement with this, and also support Jeff as
permanent

        chair of this WG.

         

        Regards--

         

        J.

         

         

        -------- Original Message --------

        Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] FW: Still working to find a meeting
time

        From: "J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx>

        Date: Wed, March 11, 2009 5:17 pm

        To: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>,
Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx

         

        On the issue of a permanent Chair, I would like to publicly go
on the

        record in support of Jeff.  Jeff has, so far, done an incredible
job of

        moving this process forward in a neutral and transparent manner.
I

        realize that there was some concern raised in Mexico City about
a

        perception issue due to perceived conflicts of interest.
Frankly, I

        think that label could apply to almost everyone who is an ACTIVE

        participant in ICANN working groups.  If this model is going to
work, we

        have to have neutral chairs (even though they may have a stake
in the

        outcome).  If this concept is flawed, I would argue we need to
know

        sooner rather than later.  I trust that Jeff will continue to be
neutral

        and impartial (as I hope to be in the WGWT); however, if he
cannot be

        (which I sincerely doubt) then we need to know that this concept
is

        flawed NOW, before we get too far down the road with these
improvements.

         

        In short, I know I don't have a vote, but I would encourage each
of you

        to strongly consider Jeff as the Chair of the PDPWT.

         

        Kind regards.

         

        J. Scott Evans

         

        j. scott evans | senior legal director, global brand & trademark
|

        Yahoo! Inc. | evansj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | 408.349.1385

         

         

        From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>

        To: Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx

        Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 1:51:45 PM

        Subject: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] FW: Still working to find a meeting
time

         

         

         All,

         

         I had hoped to have a meeting scheduled for this week to
continue the

        work we started, but it looks like due to a number of conflicts,
this

        probably will not happen.  Margie/Marika/Glen - can you send out
a

        doodle for next week.   If we could try different times on
Tuesday and

        Thursday (the 16th and 18th).  We will be circulating around the
notes

        from the meeting last week as well in the next day or so.
Finally,

        please keep in mind that we need to elect a permanent chair.  At
this

        point in time no one other than me has come forward, but if
anyone else

        is interested, please let the group know before the meeting.

         

         Thanks for your patience and sorry for the delay.

         

         Best regards,

         

         Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.: NeuStar, Inc.

         Vice President, Law & Policy 

         46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166

         [ T ] +1 571 434 5772 [ M ] +1 202 549 5079  [ F ] +1 703
738-7965 [ E

        ] jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx [ W ] www.neustar.biz  

         

         

         

        The information contained in this e-mail message is intended
only for

        the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain
confidential

        and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient you

        have received this e-mail message in error and any review,

        dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is
strictly

        prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please

        notify us immediately and delete the original message.