RE: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Draft request for a PDP-WT face-to-face meeting

["Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thank you for this note Robin.  We will discuss during the call on
Thursday.  Please rest assured that regardless of the outcome of the
issue of 1 vs 2 or 3 reps, it is my job to ensure that all viewpoints
are heard and reflected in any resulting work product.  This should have
nothing to do with the number of people from a particular group that
attend a meeting.   If I am not successful in doing my job, I expect you
all to let me know.


Thanks.

 

Jeffrey J. Neuman 
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy



________________________________

The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential
and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you
have received this e-mail message in error and any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately and delete the original message.

 

 

From: owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robin Gross
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 8:24 PM
To: Marika Konings
Cc: Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Draft request for a PDP-WT face-to-face
meeting

 

Thanks for the draft.  I have a couple concerns with it, however, before
it can meet approval.

 

I disagree with the proposition that only 1 NCSG member will be funded
to participate,  while 3 CSG representatives will be funded to
participate at this meeting.  Given the move toward parity within the
GNSO, NCSG should have equal participation to CSG at this meeting.  It
seems hardly fair for Internet users (via ICANN) to fund 3 commercial
participants while the non-commercial users are only allowed 1
representative.  NCSG would settle for 2 members to participate, however
(still less than CSG's 3).

 

I also disagree with the proposition that our participants have to meet
ICANN's "active participation" standard.  At least within NCSG, we
cannot send our member who has been most active and need to send another
person in many cases.  NCSG members coordinate among themselves on a
position and who to send to represent us.  It may not always be someone
who ICANN decides is "active" enough.  But it is ultimately up to the
NCSG  (not ICANN) as to who to send to represent noncommercial users at
the meeting.

 

Thanks,

Robin

 

 

On Dec 2, 2009, at 1:36 AM, Marika Konings wrote:





Dear All,

As discussed, please find attached the draft request for a PDP-WT
face-to-face meeting for discussion and review at our next meeting,
Thursday 3 December at 15.00 UTC. 

With best regards,

Marika <Request for a PDP WT Face to Face meeting - 2 December 2009.doc>

 

 

 

IP JUSTICE

Robin Gross, Executive Director

1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA

p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451

w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx