Re: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Draft request for a PDP-WT face-to-face meeting

[Alex Gakuru <gakuru@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Jeff,

I would like to participate on this call which will take place in
about 30 minutes. Will it be a telephony phone call or web-based?

regards,

Alex

On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Neuman, Jeff <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thank you for this note Robin.  We will discuss during the call on
> Thursday.  Please rest assured that regardless of the outcome of the issue
> of 1 vs 2 or 3 reps, it is my job to ensure that all viewpoints are heard
> and reflected in any resulting work product.  This should have nothing to do
> with the number of people from a particular group that attend a meeting.
>   If I am not successful in doing my job, I expect you all to let me know.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> Jeffrey J. Neuman
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
>
> ________________________________
>
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the
> use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and
> delete the original message.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Robin Gross
> Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 8:24 PM
> To: Marika Konings
> Cc: Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Draft request for a PDP-WT face-to-face meeting
>
>
>
> Thanks for the draft.  I have a couple concerns with it, however, before it
> can meet approval.
>
>
>
> I disagree with the proposition that only 1 NCSG member will be funded to
> participate,  while 3 CSG representatives will be funded to participate at
> this meeting.  Given the move toward parity within the GNSO, NCSG should
> have equal participation to CSG at this meeting.  It seems hardly fair for
> Internet users (via ICANN) to fund 3 commercial participants while the
> non-commercial users are only allowed 1 representative.  NCSG would settle
> for 2 members to participate, however (still less than CSG's 3).
>
>
>
> I also disagree with the proposition that our participants have to meet
> ICANN's "active participation" standard.  At least within NCSG, we cannot
> send our member who has been most active and need to send another person in
> many cases.  NCSG members coordinate among themselves on a position and who
> to send to represent us.  It may not always be someone who ICANN decides is
> "active" enough.  But it is ultimately up to the NCSG  (not ICANN) as to who
> to send to represent noncommercial users at the meeting.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Robin
>
>
>
>
>
> On Dec 2, 2009, at 1:36 AM, Marika Konings wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> As discussed, please find attached the draft request for a PDP-WT
> face-to-face meeting for discussion and review at our next meeting, Thursday
> 3 December at 15.00 UTC.
>
> With best regards,
>
> Marika <Request for a PDP WT Face to Face meeting - 2 December 2009.doc>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> IP JUSTICE
>
> Robin Gross, Executive Director
>
> 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
>
> p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
>
> w: http://www.ipjustice.org ;    e: robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>