ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-ppsc-pdp]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Agenda for today's call

  • To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "PPSC List" <Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Agenda for today's call
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 09:48:24 -0400

Good question Avri.  It is defined in an indirect way in Bylaws Article
X, Section 3, paragraph 9.c: "Initiate a PDP Not Within Scope: requires
an affirmative vote of more than 75% of one House and a majority of the
other House ("GNSO Supermajority")".

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 9:27 AM
> To: PPSC List
> Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Agenda for today's call
> 
> 
> thanks for this.
> 
> reminds me of a question i have.
> 
> where is Council super rmajority defined?  i was looking and 
> did not see it - probably missed it right underneath my nose, 
> but did not see it.
> 
> a.
> 
> On 8 Apr 2010, at 08:44, James M. Bladel wrote:
> 
> > Good morning, everyone:
> > 
> > Attached, please see the agenda for our call today at 13:30 UTC.  I 
> > think this is a fairly ambitious list, but let's endeavor to get 
> > through as much as we can prior to Jeff's return next week.
> > 
> > Talk with you soon!
> > 
> > J.
> > 
> > 
> > ----------
> > 
> > <Voting Threshholds.docx>
> 
> 
> 




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy