<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Agenda for today's call
- To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "PPSC List" <Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Agenda for today's call
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 09:48:24 -0400
Good question Avri. It is defined in an indirect way in Bylaws Article
X, Section 3, paragraph 9.c: "Initiate a PDP Not Within Scope: requires
an affirmative vote of more than 75% of one House and a majority of the
other House ("GNSO Supermajority")".
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 9:27 AM
> To: PPSC List
> Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Agenda for today's call
>
>
> thanks for this.
>
> reminds me of a question i have.
>
> where is Council super rmajority defined? i was looking and
> did not see it - probably missed it right underneath my nose,
> but did not see it.
>
> a.
>
> On 8 Apr 2010, at 08:44, James M. Bladel wrote:
>
> > Good morning, everyone:
> >
> > Attached, please see the agenda for our call today at 13:30 UTC. I
> > think this is a fairly ambitious list, but let's endeavor to get
> > through as much as we can prior to Jeff's return next week.
> >
> > Talk with you soon!
> >
> > J.
> >
> >
> > ----------
> >
> > <Voting Threshholds.docx>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|