<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-ppsc-pdp] Agenda for today's call
- To: "'Avri Doria'" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "'PPSC List'" <Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Agenda for today's call
- From: "Ken Bour" <ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:00:01 -0400
PDP Team Members:
Per Avri's question (below), the term "Supermajority" is referenced in
Bylaws ANNEX A (e.g. Section 3-c), but the definition is contained in
Article X, Section 3(9)-c (quoted below).
"c. Initiate a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an affirmative vote of more
than 75% of one House and a majority of the other House ('GNSO
Supermajority');"
I hope this helps...
Ken Bour
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 9:27 AM
To: PPSC List
Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Agenda for today's call
thanks for this.
reminds me of a question i have.
where is Council super rmajority defined? i was looking and did not see it
- probably missed it right underneath my nose, but did not see it.
a.
On 8 Apr 2010, at 08:44, James M. Bladel wrote:
> Good morning, everyone:
>
> Attached, please see the agenda for our call today at 13:30 UTC. I
> think this is a fairly ambitious list, but let's endeavor to get
> through as much as we can prior to Jeff's return next week.
>
> Talk with you soon!
>
> J.
>
>
> ----------
>
> <Voting Threshholds.docx>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|