<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Recommendation 10
- To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, "Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Recommendation 10
- From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:13:31 -0800
Just a small clarification, it considers recommendation 13 related to
Issue 10 - Impact Analysis. Also note that the initial recommendation
related to the use of impact analysis prior to taking a decision on the
initiation of a PDP, not at the end.
Best regards,
Marika
On 31/01/11 15:08, "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>I suggest the following wording for 10.
>
>
>To ensure that its decisions empower people around the globe, spur
>innovation, facilitate trade and commerce, and enable the free and
>unfettered flow of information and are in the global public interest, and
>not just the interests of a particular set of stakeholders, ICANN commits
>to perform and publish analyses of the positive and negative effects of
>its decisions on the gobal public, including but not limited to any
>financial impact on the public, the positive or negative impact (if any)
>on the systemic security, the stability and resiliency of the DNS and on
>the human rights of global Internet users.
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|