Re: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Updated outstanding issues document + action items

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

At 03/02/2011 11:42 AM, Marika Konings wrote:
>    * Recommendation # 18 - There was support for modifying the 
> recommendation so that it would highlight that dialogue between 
> GNSO Council members and the requesting AC would be adesirable 
> option to pursue following a vote against the initiation of a 
> PDPeither to better understand the reasons for declining a PDP 
> and/or determining whether there would be options to modify the 
> request so that it would receive support. Alan agreed to draft 
> language for consideration by the WT.
Draft text for Recommendation 18

The PDP-WT recommends that if the GNSO votes to not initiate a PDP 
following an Issues Report requested by an AC, the AC or its 
representatives should have the right to a meeting with 
representatives of the GNSO, and in particular, those voting against 
the PDP, to discuss the rationale for the rejection and why the AC 
feels that reconsideration is appropriate. Following this meeting, 
the AC may submit a statement to the GNSO Council requesting a 
re-vote and giving it's rationale for such re-vote. This process may 
be followed just once for any given Issues Report.