Re: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Updated outstanding issues document + action items

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Looks good to me.

thanks,

a.

On 3 Feb 2011, at 14:14, Alan Greenberg wrote:

> At 03/02/2011 11:42 AM, Marika Konings wrote:
>>      • Recommendation # 18 - There was support for modifying the 
>> recommendation so that it would highlight that dialogue between GNSO Council 
>> members and the requesting AC would be adesirable option to pursue following 
>> a vote against the initiation of a PDPeither to better understand the 
>> reasons for declining a PDP and/or determining whether there would be 
>> options to modify the request so that it would receive support. Alan agreed 
>> to draft language for consideration by the WT.
> Draft text for Recommendation 18
> 
> The PDP-WT recommends that if the GNSO votes to not initiate a PDP following 
> an Issues Report requested by an AC, the AC or its representatives should 
> have the right to a meeting with representatives of the GNSO, and in 
> particular, those voting against the PDP, to discuss the rationale for the 
> rejection and why the AC feels that reconsideration is appropriate. Following 
> this meeting, the AC may submit a statement to the GNSO Council requesting a 
> re-vote and giving it's rationale for such re-vote. This process may be 
> followed just once for any given Issues Report.