RE: AW: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] RE: Updated version of proposed Final Report

[Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'll be on the first 30 minutes of the call.
Re Rec 7: 
Would just note that a PDP might be launched in good faith, and during the 
development/analysis phase, the group determine that a change in policy is not 
necessary. That would still be a 'recommendation', I think, although the 
recommendaiton might be not to change existing policy. When I chaired the WHOIS 
Task Force, we made several recommendations, and one was to postpone action in 
a particular area. STILL a recommendation. Maybe that was the intent? The Group 
might not reach consensus on a recommendation, in which case different 
recommendations, with level of support would be provided, right?




Subject: AW: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] RE: Updated version of proposed Final Report
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:48:53 +0100
From: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
To: Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx; marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx












Just some small edits and questions: 

1. be consistent 
in calling it "proposed Final Report". There are still some "draft" in Jeff's 
revised text.
2. Is it practical to the potential reader to look for 
the "Initial Report" (see note on p. 3, para before Stage 1) for further 
context? Isn't there a more useful method like attaching the 
contexts?
3. p. 6 line 7: "may" or " should" or something eles. This 
sentence is talking about "reality is...". To ral facts May/should doesn't fit 
either.
4. Rec 7: "a 
conclusion that no recommendation is necessary"? That sounds a bit artificial. 
Why undertake the whole PDP in advance and then coming to such a 
conclusion?
5. 
Rec. 10: I don't think the word "properly" (in "properly supported motion") is 
necessary
6. 
Rec. 19, last sentence: Is it clear enough that the first 2adopted" refers to 
the charter itself whereby the 2nd is referring to the mofications 
only?
 
Since 
I can't participate in the meeting today I leave it for consideration by the 
team and shall accept any outcome.
 

Best regards 

Wolf-Ulrich 
 


  
  
  Von: owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx 
  [mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Neuman, 
  Jeff
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. Februar 2011 04:00
An: 
  Neuman, Jeff; Marika Konings; Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
Betreff: 
  [gnso-ppsc-pdp] RE: Updated version of proposed Final 
  Report


  
  
  All,
   
  Please 
  find my proposed revisions, comments and suggestions to Section 2 of the 
  Report.  As with the changes to the Executive Summary, these are being 
  proposed in my personal capacity and NOT as the Chair of the PDP-WT or a 
  Registry representative.  
   
   
   
  
  Jeffrey 
  J. Neuman 
  
Neustar, 
  Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  The 
  information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of 
  the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
  information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this 
  e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or 
  copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
  communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original 
  message.
   
   
  
  
  From: 
  owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx] On 
  Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 8:35 
  PM
To: Marika Konings; Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: 
  [gnso-ppsc-pdp] RE: Updated version of proposed Final 
  Report
   
  All,
   
  Sorry 
  for doing this piece-meal, but I did some editing of the Executive Summary 
and 
  am providing it to everyone at the same time.  I do not believe I changed 
  any of the substance, but tried to provide a little more 
  context.
   
  As 
  this will be the first thing that is read (and may be the only one sad to 
  say), I wanted to make sure that certain aspects stood out.  
  
  
No 
  pride of authorship here, so if you don’t like or agree with the revisions, 
  just let me know.
  
Thanks.
   
  
  Jeffrey 
  J. Neuman 
  
Neustar, 
  Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  The 
  information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of 
  the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
  information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this 
  e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or 
  copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
  communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original 
  message.
   
   
  
  
  From: 
  owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx] On 
  Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 
  11:52 AM
To: Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: 
  [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Updated version of proposed Final 
  Report
   
  
  Dear 
  All,
  
   
  
  Please 
  find attached an updated version of the proposed PDP-WT Final Report which 
  includes the changes / edits discussed during Monday's meeting as well as the 
  high-level overview graphic. 
  
   
  
  As 
  a reminder, any substantial issues on the proposed Final Report will need 
  to be submitted before Thursday's meeting of the PDP WT (14.30 
  UTC). Any non-substantial issues (typos, etc.) should be submitted at 
  the latest by close of business on Friday 18 
  February.
  
   
  
  Best 
  regards,
  
   
  
  Marika