<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-ppsc-wg] WIKI Updates and Suggestions
- To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@xxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc-wg] WIKI Updates and Suggestions
- From: Cheryl Langdon-Orr <cheryl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 08:00:56 +1100
We could always annotate our edits / comments with <initials> to track
changes in the Wiki documentation...
<CLO> just a thought ...
CLO
Thomas Roessler wrote:
Been there, found it was hell, stopped doing it.
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@xxxxxx>
On 13 Mar 2009, at 18:55, Ken Bour wrote:
Another idea I had to simulate the redlining concept is to make use
of strikethrough and/or certain symbols to show edits within the
document. All we would need is a convention so that everyone is
working from the same understanding as to its usage/meaning. One
idea would be to put new text inside symbols like “< >” (we just have
to make sure that it’s not a reserved WIKI symbol). Another
important factor is who made the change; for that, maybe we could use
“\”. I tested these symbols and they appear to work without causing
unexpected results on the WIKI page.
As an example, if I wanted to take the following line and edit it
using this approach:
[Note: you need HTML enabled in your email reader to see the
strikethrough text below].
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|