<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-ppsc-wg] Consensus Discussion: Additional Thought
- To: "gnso-ppsc-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-ppsc-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-ppsc-wg] Consensus Discussion: Additional Thought
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:30:39 +0000
hi,
Certainly in my mind, except for the unanimity, there would also be
minority opinions attached to any recommendation.
I though we were just picking the categories and their names and not
what was included in any recommendation.
a.
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 03:48 -0700, Tim Ruiz wrote:
> That works for me, except that the concept of minority opinions seems
> to
> be getting left out. I believe that any view or position that is
> stated
> or requested to be included should be, with a showing of the support
> for
> it, even if it's a single participant. Perhaps that is assumed, but
> want
> to be sure.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|