<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-ppsc-wg] Your feedback requested: Section 2.1.4.1 Introductions
- To: "gnso-ppsc-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-ppsc-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-ppsc-wg] Your feedback requested: Section 2.1.4.1 Introductions
- From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 02:17:47 -0700
>From the GNSO Working Group Guidelines
2.1.4.1 Introductions
For team-building purposes, to understand its resources and capabilities and,
potentially, to help with prospective assignments, members of the Working Group
should be provided with the opportunity, at the start of the first meeting, to
share information regarding interests, background, skills, experience,
especially as related to any requirements in the Charter,
Members of the Working Group should be informed that all GNSO Working Groups
are expected to operate under the principles of transparency and openness,
which means, inter alia, that mailing lists are publicly archived, meetings are
normally recorded and/or transcribed, and SOIs are required from Working Group
participants which will be publicly posted.
________________________________
Comment
GD: Section 2.1.4.1 establishes instructions for the initial meeting of the
working group, and emphasizes the ICANN principles of transparency and openness
with regard to working group meetings, deliberations, and documents. However,
does the PPSC WG-WT envision any exceptional scenarios in which the working
group would desire confidentiality? There may be value in this, especially if
the subject matter involves DNS security and stability vulnerabilities. Should
the PPSC WG-WT consider an exception to the transparency requirement, it should
set a high threshold for making such a request, and establish a clear process
for disclosing the final output of any closed deliberations.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|