| <<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 Re: [gnso-ppsc-wg] Your feedback requested - section 3.7. Appeal Process
To: gnso-ppsc-wg@xxxxxxxxxSubject: Re: [gnso-ppsc-wg] Your feedback requested - section 3.7. Appeal ProcessFrom: Iliya Bazlyankov <iliya.bazlyankov@xxxxxxxx>Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 16:36:49 +0300 
 
Marika Konings написа:
 
*3.7 Appeal Process
*
Any WG member that believes that his/her contributions are being 
systematically ignored or discounted or wants to appeal a decision of 
the WG or CO should first discuss the circumstances with the WG Chair. 
In the event that the matter cannot be resolved satisfactorily, the WG 
member should request an opportunity to discuss the situation with the 
Chair of the Chartering Organization. 
In addition, if any member of the WG is of the opinion that someone is 
not performing their role according to the criteria outlined in 
section 2.2. of this document, the same appeals process may be invoked. 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
/Comments
CG: In the appeal process, why isn’t there an intermediate step? The 
proposed process goes straight from the WG chair to the CO. How about 
using the Liaison as a middle step?/
 
I don`t see a point in this - its unnecessary... What should the Liason 
do in this case - just forward the complaint to the chair? Or attempt to 
resolve it? 
Kind regards,
Iliya
 
 <<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 |