ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-ppsc-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-ppsc-wg] Your feedback requested - section 3.7. Appeal Process

  • To: gnso-ppsc-wg@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc-wg] Your feedback requested - section 3.7. Appeal Process
  • From: Iliya Bazlyankov <iliya.bazlyankov@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 16:36:49 +0300


Marika Konings написа:
*3.7 Appeal Process
*
Any WG member that believes that his/her contributions are being systematically ignored or discounted or wants to appeal a decision of the WG or CO should first discuss the circumstances with the WG Chair. In the event that the matter cannot be resolved satisfactorily, the WG member should request an opportunity to discuss the situation with the Chair of the Chartering Organization.

In addition, if any member of the WG is of the opinion that someone is not performing their role according to the criteria outlined in section 2.2. of this document, the same appeals process may be invoked.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
/Comments

CG: In the appeal process, why isn’t there an intermediate step? The proposed process goes straight from the WG chair to the CO. How about using the Liaison as a middle step?/

I don`t see a point in this - its unnecessary... What should the Liason do in this case - just forward the complaint to the chair? Or attempt to resolve it?

Kind regards,
Iliya



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy