<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-ppsc-wg] Your feedback requested - section 3.7. Appeal Process
- To: gnso-ppsc-wg@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc-wg] Your feedback requested - section 3.7. Appeal Process
- From: Iliya Bazlyankov <iliya.bazlyankov@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 16:36:49 +0300
Marika Konings написа:
*3.7 Appeal Process
*
Any WG member that believes that his/her contributions are being
systematically ignored or discounted or wants to appeal a decision of
the WG or CO should first discuss the circumstances with the WG Chair.
In the event that the matter cannot be resolved satisfactorily, the WG
member should request an opportunity to discuss the situation with the
Chair of the Chartering Organization.
In addition, if any member of the WG is of the opinion that someone is
not performing their role according to the criteria outlined in
section 2.2. of this document, the same appeals process may be invoked.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
/Comments
CG: In the appeal process, why isn’t there an intermediate step? The
proposed process goes straight from the WG chair to the CO. How about
using the Liaison as a middle step?/
I don`t see a point in this - its unnecessary... What should the Liason
do in this case - just forward the complaint to the chair? Or attempt to
resolve it?
Kind regards,
Iliya
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|