Re: [gnso-ppsc-wg] Your feedback requested - section 3.7. Appeal Process

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

On 4 May 2010, at 14:37, Marika Konings wrote:

> 3.7 Appeal Process
> 
> Any WG member that believes that his/her contributions are being 
> systematically ignored or discounted or wants to appeal a decision of the WG 
> or CO should first discuss the circumstances with the WG Chair. In the event 
> that the matter cannot be resolved satisfactorily, the WG member should 
> request an opportunity to discuss the situation with the Chair of the 
> Chartering Organization. 
> 
> In addition, if any member of the WG is of the opinion that someone is not 
> performing their role according to the criteria outlined in section 2.2. of 
> this document, the same appeals process may be invoked.
> 
> Comments
> 
> CG: In the appeal process, why isn’t there an intermediate step? The proposed 
> process goes straight from the WG chair to the CO. How about using the 
> Liaison as a middle step?


i agree.  though in many cases the liaison will have to go to the CO for advice.

a.