<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-ppsc-wg] Your feedback requested - Section 6 Charter Guidelines
- To: Working Group <gnso-ppsc-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc-wg] Your feedback requested - Section 6 Charter Guidelines
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 13:58:38 -0400
On 17 May 2010, at 10:48, Marika Konings wrote:
> 6. Charter Guidelines
>
> This section of the document is intended to assist any GNSO Chartering
> Organization in its effective implementation of Working Groups by providing a
> set of guidelines, checklists, templates, and other 'best practice' materials
> that it may consider and/or utilize, as appropriate, in creating, chartering,
> staffing, and guiding a Working Group (WG) to accomplish some desired
> outcome. The term “Chartering Organization” (CO), in this context, can be any
> formal entity or informal grouping of individuals that wishes to generate a
> WG Charter document.
>
> These Guidelines are organized into three major sections as follows:
>
> SECTION 6.1: Contains suggestions and recommendations related to the
> implementation of Working Groups within the GNSO.
>
> SECTION 6.2: Is organized and structured to be a template containing
> specific elements that are recommended to be considered by any CO intending
> to produce a specific Working Group Charter document.
>
> SECTION 6.3: Contains background information informing the effort to create
> this document.
>
> Comments:
>
> INTA: The introduction to Section 6 states that this section is intended to
> assist any CO in its effective implementation of a WG by providing a set of
> guidelines, etc. that the CO “can consider and/or utilize as appropriate.”
> The Committee recommends:
>
> · More strongly encouraging adherence to at least certain of the key
> guidelines, including those promoting the solicitation of input and
> participation from all stakeholders and those requiring disclosures of
> interest from working group members.
>
ok as long as it remains a guideline, strongly suggesting is ok.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|