ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-ppsc-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-ppsc-wg] Your feedback requested - Section 6 Charter Guidelines

  • To: Working Group <gnso-ppsc-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc-wg] Your feedback requested - Section 6 Charter Guidelines
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 13:58:38 -0400


On 17 May 2010, at 10:48, Marika Konings wrote:

> 6. Charter Guidelines
> 
> This section of the document is intended to assist any GNSO Chartering 
> Organization in its effective implementation of Working Groups by providing a 
> set of guidelines, checklists, templates, and other 'best practice' materials 
> that it may consider and/or utilize, as appropriate, in creating, chartering, 
> staffing, and guiding a Working Group (WG) to accomplish some desired 
> outcome. The term “Chartering Organization” (CO), in this context, can be any 
> formal entity or informal grouping of individuals that wishes to generate a 
> WG Charter document.
> 
> These Guidelines are organized into three major sections as follows:
> 
> SECTION 6.1:  Contains suggestions and recommendations related to the 
> implementation of Working Groups within the GNSO. 
> 
> SECTION 6.2:  Is organized and structured to be a template containing 
> specific elements that are recommended to be considered by any CO intending 
> to produce a specific Working Group Charter document.
> 
> SECTION 6.3:  Contains background information informing the effort to create 
> this document.
> 
> Comments:
> 
> INTA: The introduction to Section 6 states that this section is intended to 
> assist any CO in its effective implementation of a WG by providing a set of 
> guidelines, etc. that the CO “can consider and/or utilize as appropriate.” 
> The Committee recommends:
> 
> · More strongly encouraging adherence to at least certain of the key 
> guidelines, including those promoting the solicitation of input and 
> participation from all stakeholders and those requiring disclosures of 
> interest from working group members.
> 

ok  as long as it remains a guideline, strongly suggesting is ok.



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy