RE: [gnso-pro-wg] Revised Proposals Chart Based on Today's Meeting
Please see attached revision that includes the below additions. Kelly Smith ________________________________ From: owner-gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Smith, Kelly W Sent: May 15, 2007 1:13 PM To: Rosette, Kristina; gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [gnso-pro-wg] Revised Proposals Chart Based on Today's Meeting All, I propose the following alternative language for principle #7 (new language in red): The fees charged by a gTLD for participation in its RPM SHOULD be reasonable and each gTLD applicant MUST identify in its application the basis of its fee calculation. on which it anticipates charging fees. I propose the following language regarding validation (revised from #8, which we did not agree on). If we cannot reach agreement, I believe this at least has support: The Prior Rights on which a party bases its participation and seeks to protect in an RPM SHOULD be subject to actual validation, at least if the validity of such rights is challenged validated. I propose the following new principle (based on the questionable inclusion of U.S. registrations as a rights basis in the .asia launch), and am happy to hear suggestions regarding alternative language: To the extent a gTLD is intended for/targeted to a particular geographic region, the Prior Right on which a rights owner bases its participation in the RPM SHOULD originate from the laws of a country in that region. Finally I agree with Avri's comments concerning applicability to IDNs, and perhaps we can use this language, as the final principle: The aforementioned principles should equally apply to both ASCII/LDH TLDs and IDN TLDs. Kristina, let me know if you'd like me to reflect these in a further redline, or if you'll be collecting everyone's comments into a new version before the call tomorrow. Thanks Kelly Smith Intel Corporation ________________________________ From: owner-gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:owner-gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx> ] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina Sent: May 14, 2007 2:29 PM To: gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx Subject: [gnso-pro-wg] Revised Proposals Chart Based on Today's Meeting All, Attached is an updated proposals chart that reflects the discussion today. I have also attached a redline. As you will see, I have indicated the current level of support (based on my notes) for the proposals we discussed and as we discussed revising them. Please review them and let me know ASAP if I have mischaracterized the "revised" proposal and/or the level of support. Tim, once you've had a chance to review, would you please post whether any of these specific points could be used instead of your principles 1-6? I will create a consolidated proposals chart shortly before our call on Wednesday. Kristina <<Redline PRO WG Proposals Chart.DOC>> <<05142007 PRO WG Proposals Chart.DOC>> Attachment:
05152007 PRO WG Proposals Chart.DOC
|