[gnso-raa-b] RE: RAA: topics in category #7: Whois

["Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx>]

> RAA subteam B participants: 
> 
> As discussed on our most recent call, in order to move our work
> forward, it was recommended that we launch discussion of some of the
> remaining categories in the compiled list of RAA amendment topics.  (I
> am using the revised chart, posted earlier today and dated today,
> December 30.)  
> 
> According to my notes, we have discussed topics 1-4 in our previous
> call. On topic 5 -- compliance -- I have, by a message posted earlier
> today, asked staff to provide their views on our next call on Tuesday,
> Jan. 5.  I have just circulated a message regarding topic #6.      
> 
> Here are some views put forward to get the discussion started on topic
> #7, recognizing that our role at this stage is primarily to organize
> and prioritize the topics proposed, rather than to delve too deeply
> into the details of the proposals made.  (This does not preclude us
> from deciding, if we can, that one or another topic is simply out of
> scope or not appropriate for consideration with regard to RAA
> amendments.) 
> 
RE:     Topics in category #7

Category 7 includes a number of topics, all related in some way to
Whois.  
In order to get the discussion started, I suggest that we put the
following topics in the "higher priority" category:
A:  7.1 (also 7.6):  required registrar responses to reported inaccurate
Whois data 
B:  7.2 and 7.3:  links to be provided by registrar
C:  7.7:  Whois Service Level Agreement
The following topics appear to me to be more far-reaching and may take
more time to deal with:
D:  7.4 (additional data collection requirements)
E:  7.9 (validation of data collected from registrants) 
I have omitted from this list the following topics: 
7.5:  not clear how this would be reflected in an RAA amendment
7.8: this topic more properly belongs in the Compliance topic (#5). 
Reactions welcomed on the list.... 
Steve Metalitz
>     
>      
> 
> 
> 
>