[gnso-raa-b] Revised subteam B timetable

["Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx>]

RAA subteam B participants,  

The attached is also for discussion on our call on Monday.  It reflects
the advice we received from staff on the last call re due dates and the
discussion then about a "workshop" or similar event in Brussels.  

Steve Metalitz

 <<Proposed subteam B timetable 042310 (2541107-3).DOC>> 
> _____________________________________________ 
> From:         Metalitz, Steven  
> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 11:19 AM
> To:   gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject:      Proposed "high priority" list for task 1 
> 
> RAA subteam B participants, 
> Attached please find a proposed slimmed-down list of "high priority"
> topics for inclusion in our report under Task 1.  This is for
> discussion on our mailing list and also on our next call (2000 UTC on
> Monday 4/26).  
> I have tried to consolidate items in our matrix where topics
> overlapped. (See the third column for cross-reference to our matrix.)
> I also attach on the last page of the document the list of topics that
> had been listed on the matrix as "high priority" but did not make the
> cut.  I believe 12 "high priority" topics ought to be a manageable
> list but of course the subteam may wish to expand or contract it
> further.  
> A few other observations, all of which should be included in our
> report:
> (1)  This list follows (more or less) the order of topics within our
> matrix.  It is not in itself a priority ranking (i.e., #1 is not
> necessarily a higher priority than #12), and I don't think we have any
> requirement to make such a granular priority ranking.  
> (2)  The list does not include any issues that appear to be mainly
> compliance topics (i.e., where staff has advised that the tools
> already exist under the current RAA to achieve the stated goal). 
> (3) The list also does not include topics related to due diligence on
> applicants for accreditation , since these would not be directly
> reflected in the RAA that the applicant would sign once it had been
> accredited.  (We should explain in the report how these suggested
> topics are being handled - staff, how should we do so?) 
> Looking forward to your reactions, both on the mailing list and on our
> call.  
> Steve Metalitz << File: DRAFT high priority RAA amendment topics
> 042310 (2663581-2).DOC >> 
>

Attachment: Proposed subteam B timetable 042310 (2541107-3).DOC
Description: Proposed subteam B timetable 042310 (2541107-3).DOC