<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-raa-b] RAA processes
- To: gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-raa-b] RAA processes
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 19:20:03 -0400
On 21 May 2010, at 19:02, Mason Cole wrote:
> If all of ICANN is contracted, it's interesting then that the GNSO has a
> non-contracted house.
Nice argument, I appreciate it.
We are non-contracted in so far as we are individual members of the Stakeholder
Groups.
As part of the unity that is ICANN we are part of ICANN who is party to the
contract.
The real paradox is that as a registrar you are both an individually contracted
party as well as part of the unity that is ICANN as a party to the contract.
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|