ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-raa-b]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-raa-b] Comments on Section V and Process B Statement of Support

  • To: "Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx>, <gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-b] Comments on Section V and Process B Statement of Support
  • From: "Hammock, Statton" <shammock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 16:15:35 -0400

Steve, 

 

I was able to finally review the edits you made after incorporating my
suggested changes. Thanks so much for doing so and I am fine with the
additional edits.  I look forward to reviewing the staff's final version
as soon as it's ready. 

 

Thanks again. 

 

Statton 

 

 Statton Hammock 
 Sr. Director, Law, Policy & Business Affairs 

 

P 703-668-5515  M 703-624-5031 <http://www.networksolutions.com> 
www.networksolutions.com

 

 

________________________________

From: Metalitz, Steven [mailto:met@xxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 2:36 PM
To: Hammock, Statton; gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-b] Comments on Section V and Process B Statement
of Support

 

Thanks for these edits, Statton. The attached accepts virtually all of
them.  The exceptions are when you have either edited the text of
Proposed Process A, or retorted directly to the supporting statement
(e.g., in the reference to "active" participation).  Obviously the
supporters of Process A could do the same and critique what is in your
supporting statement, but rather than play tit for tat I suggest that
the supporting statements respond to the Proposed Process lists only.
(For the same reason, I think your footnote is not appropriate with
regard to "active" participation, but I leave it up to you and your
colleagues whether or not to retain it.)     

 

I have also made the changes I suggested a few minutes ago to the
sentence concerning the position of Avri and others.   I also changed
the last sentence of the 2d paragraph because both proposed processes
call for public comment.  

 

I believe we are just about done in terms of our editing work and look
forward to receiving the staff's final version no later than Monday. Of
course if I am mistaken in my belief I am sure someone will correct me! 

 

Steve

 

 

 

________________________________

From: owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Hammock, Statton
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 5:58 PM
To: gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-raa-b] Comments on Section V and Process B Statement of
Support

Steve, 

 

Attached is a redline showing recommended changes to your initial draft
of Section V of the RAA Initial Draft Report (which also incorporates
Avri's edit from today).  

 

This version also includes a draft Statement of Support for Proposed
Process B.   Also, I'd like to follow-up Tim's request from yesterday to
add SubTeam B's attendance record to Annex C.  

 

Questions or comments from the SubTeam are welcome but please also be
sure to copy Tim and Michele as I will be out of the office on Thursday
and Friday and may be unable to respond to comments as quickly as I
would like. 

 

Best Regards,

 

Statton 

 

 Statton Hammock 
 Sr. Director, Law, Policy & Business Affairs 



P 703-668-5515  M 703-624-5031 <http://www.networksolutions.com> 
www.networksolutions.com

 

 

GIF image



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy