RE: [gnso-raa-b] Draft Presentation on Initial Report for Monday's Session

["Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>]

+1 (or should that be 2?) 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 3:49 PM
To: gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: gnso-rrc-a@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-raa-b] Draft Presentation on Initial Report for
Monday's Session


+1


On 16 Jun 2010, at 14:34, Metalitz, Steven wrote:

> I disagree, this is part of our assignment, and part of our report.
It is up for public comment and should be at least mentioned in the
presentation. 
> 
> From: Hammock, Statton [mailto:shammock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 2:01 PM
> To: Metalitz, Steven; Margie Milam; gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx; 
> gnso-rrc-a@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-b] Draft Presentation on Initial Report for 
> Monday's Session
> 
> Steve,
>  
> I am not sure that I agree that we should have a slide that lays out
the three staked out positions on next steps because this might generate
a debate on this particular topic which is not the purpose of the
meeting, nor I believe, the forum for it.  We need to be sure we
complete our presentation and that we have enough time for the panel
discussion.  
>  
> Statton
>  
>  
>  
> From: owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx] 
> On Behalf Of Metalitz, Steven
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 4:49 PM
> To: Margie Milam; gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-rrc-a@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-b] Draft Presentation on Initial Report for 
> Monday's Session
>  
> Thanks Margie, these look good.
>  
>  (1)  We need an additional slide regarding the recommended next steps
on RAA amendments (this would go just before law enforcement
perspectives):
>  
> Strong Support:  Include observers in negotiations (representing 
> interests of affected non-parties)
>  
> Substantial Opposition:  Only registrars and ICANN staff in 
> negotiations
>  
> Some Subteam Members:  Third parties should be full participants in 
> negotiations
>  
> Agreement that there must be periodic reports from negotiations,
including text.
>  
> (2)  Should the blank slide read "Questions/Comments"? 
>  
> Steve
>  
>  
>  
>   
>  
> From: owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx] 
> On Behalf Of Margie Milam
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 3:38 PM
> To: gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-rrc-a@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-raa-b] Draft Presentation on Initial Report for 
> Monday's Session
> 
> Dear All,
>  
> Please find attached for your review draft slides  for Monday's
presentation on the RAA Initial Report.
>  
> Please provide your comments or revisions by COB on this Thursday,  17
June 2010.
>  
> Best regards,
>  
> Margie
>  
> _______________
> Margie Milam
> Senior Policy Counselor
> ICANN
> _______________