ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-raa-b]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-raa-b] Draft Presentation on Initial Report for Monday's Session

  • To: gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-raa-b] Draft Presentation on Initial Report for Monday's Session
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:48:35 -0400

+1


On 16 Jun 2010, at 14:34, Metalitz, Steven wrote:

> I disagree, this is part of our assignment, and part of our report.  It is up 
> for public comment and should be at least mentioned in the presentation. 
> 
> From: Hammock, Statton [mailto:shammock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 2:01 PM
> To: Metalitz, Steven; Margie Milam; gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-rrc-a@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-b] Draft Presentation on Initial Report for Monday's 
> Session
> 
> Steve,
>  
> I am not sure that I agree that we should have a slide that lays out the 
> three staked out positions on next steps because this might generate a debate 
> on this particular topic which is not the purpose of the meeting, nor I 
> believe, the forum for it.  We need to be sure we complete our presentation 
> and that we have enough time for the panel discussion.  
>  
> Statton
>  
>  
>  
> From: owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Metalitz, Steven
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 4:49 PM
> To: Margie Milam; gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-rrc-a@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-b] Draft Presentation on Initial Report for Monday's 
> Session
>  
> Thanks Margie, these look good.
>  
>  (1)  We need an additional slide regarding the recommended next steps on RAA 
> amendments (this would go just before law enforcement perspectives):
>  
> Strong Support:  Include observers in negotiations (representing interests of 
> affected non-parties)
>  
> Substantial Opposition:  Only registrars and ICANN staff in negotiations 
>  
> Some Subteam Members:  Third parties should be full participants in 
> negotiations
>  
> Agreement that there must be periodic reports from negotiations, including 
> text.
>  
> (2)  Should the blank slide read "Questions/Comments"? 
>  
> Steve
>  
>  
>  
>   
>  
> From: owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Margie Milam
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 3:38 PM
> To: gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-rrc-a@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-raa-b] Draft Presentation on Initial Report for Monday's 
> Session
> 
> Dear All,
>  
> Please find attached for your review draft slides  for Monday’s presentation 
> on the RAA Initial Report.
>  
> Please provide your comments or revisions by COB on this Thursday,  17 June 
> 2010.
>  
> Best regards,
>  
> Margie
>  
> _______________
> Margie Milam
> Senior Policy Counselor
> ICANN
> _______________





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy