RE: [gnso-raa-dt] Re: Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA) Drafting Team (DT) call on TUESDAY, June 09 at 1300 UTC.

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

The Rights Charter should be doing the first understanding that you
described. Anything that falls into the latter understanding should be a
discussion for the RAA group - unless it is something that is subject to
consensus policy then there is already a mechanism for that. 

Tim

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [gnso-raa-dt] Re: Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA) 
Drafting Team (DT) call on TUESDAY, June 09 at 1300 UTC.
From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, June 05, 2009 1:17 pm
To: gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx


I think that one other thing that needs to be at least raised at this 
joint meeting is the issue of what Registrants Rights Charter is. I 
know that some people believe that it is just a list of existing 
registrant rights and responsibilities (presumably in clear, 
understandable language) as referenced in section 3.15 of the new 
RAA, and others think that it is list of rights that a registrant 
should have, but are not necessarily currently enshrined in any gTLD 
rules/agreements/contracts. We cannot commission people to work on a 
charter until that is defined.

Alan

At 05/06/2009 01:15 PM, Avri Doria wrote (among other things):
>So this is to be the first meeting in which we try to figure out how
>we are going to proceed. My view of the agenda:
>
>- figure out who is going to coordinate this team, i will start out as
>interim on it until replaced.
>- figure out how many groups we need
>- figure out how the GNSO and ALAc are going to work together on this
>- get volunteers to start working on charters and motions.