RE: [gnso-raa-dt] Charter of rights - "wish list"

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Alan, that is why these efforts should be separate. Creating a postable
charter based on existing rights/responsibilities could be a relatively
quick endeavor. Discussions of *wish lists* is another matter entirely.

The discussion on changes to the RAA that various parties would like to
see should be an effort of its own. If there is a new registrant right
or responsibility someone would like to see, or one that someone would
like to change, it should be brought up in the RAA discussion group. But
as I suggested, I think there should be a limited number of stakeholder
*representatives* involved in this group who would bring such items to
the table.


Tim

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [gnso-raa-dt] Charter of rights - "wish list"
From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, August 03, 2009 3:10 pm
To: gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx


I have some trouble understanding how we will arrive at the wish-list 
part of the charter development.

Is this just going to be the registrant/users who develop it, or will 
this need to be done in conjunction with the registrars?

If the latter, it sounds like it is replicating work that will need 
to be done by the future RAA working group (or whatever mechanism is 
used), and it also pre-supposes that the registrars are agreeing to 
such future rights in advance of the actual discussion/negotiation.

Alan