Re: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Works for me.

if i don't hear an objection (and it has been out for a week) i will  
put a motion on the table for  it by Thursday.
I will make the motion on behalf of this group (assuming no objection)  
and will look for someone to second.
I will also recommend that we send it to the ALAC for review since it  
is a joint effort, or at least part A is.
Though at this point I tend to think of all of it as a joint effort.

Thanks Steve for the work and for the ping.

a.


On 25 Aug 2009, at 17:50, Metalitz, Steven wrote:

> Is there any objection to the revised draft charter circulated a week
> ago (re-attached for ready reference)?
>
> Steve Metalitz
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 11:38 PM
> To: gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter
>
>
>
> On 18 Aug 2009, at 11:49, Metalitz, Steven wrote:
>
> > Could staff or Avri clarify by what date we would need to reach
> > agreement on the charter in order to get it on the September 3  
> > council
> > agenda?
>
> the latest is a week before: 27 August for the charter and a motion
> but as soon as we can is best.
>
> a.
>
>
> <Re-revised draft of DT charter (2339928).MSG>