Re: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter

[Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx>]

ALAC held its August meeting 8 hrs ago but when formally notified of the
outcome we will get it into our review process and we'll follow up
specifically with the ALAC ExCom's guidance (who meet again mid month) and
outreach to our At-Large and ALS community / Regional Meetings throughout
the month; As well as listing it on our September meeting ALAC Agenda...
CLO

2009/8/26 Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>

>
> Hi,
>
> Works for me.
>
> if i don't hear an objection (and it has been out for a week) i will put a
> motion on the table for  it by Thursday.
> I will make the motion on behalf of this group (assuming no objection) and
> will look for someone to second.
>
> I will also recommend that we send it to the ALAC for review since it is a
> joint effort, or at least part A is.
> Though at this point I tend to think of all of it as a joint effort.
>
> Thanks Steve for the work and for the ping.
>
> a.
>
>
> On 25 Aug 2009, at 17:50, Metalitz, Steven wrote:
>
>  Is there any objection to the revised draft charter circulated a week
>> ago (re-attached for ready reference)?
>>
>> Steve Metalitz
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
>> On Behalf Of Avri Doria
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 11:38 PM
>> To: gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter
>>
>>
>>
>> On 18 Aug 2009, at 11:49, Metalitz, Steven wrote:
>>
>>  Could staff or Avri clarify by what date we would need to reach
>>> agreement on the charter in order to get it on the September 3 council
>>> agenda?
>>>
>>
>>
>> the latest is a week before: 27 August for the charter and a motion
>> but as soon as we can is best.
>>
>> a.
>>
>>
>> <Re-revised draft of DT charter (2339928).MSG>
>>
>
>


-- 
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
(CLO)