RE: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter
I <<2310153.DOC>> really don't see the need for this change but would not object if Mike's sentence were inserted at the end of the charter section, see attached. Steve Metalitz -----Original Message----- From: Mike Rodenbaugh [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:05 PM To: Metalitz, Steven; gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter Thanks Steve. I just want to avoid people thinking the registrant rights/responsibilities doc is done after the first pass, since new or altered rights or responsibilities might come out of the work in Section B. I can support this if it is clarified that the output of Charter section A, when completed, may be subject to revision upon the completion of Charter Section B3 and/or the next steps envisioned by that section. Thanks, Mike Mike Rodenbaugh Rodenbaugh Law 548 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94104 +1.415.738.8087 www.rodenbaugh.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Metalitz, Steven Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 2:50 PM To: Avri Doria; gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter Is there any objection to the revised draft charter circulated a week ago (re-attached for ready reference)? Steve Metalitz -----Original Message----- From: owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 11:38 PM To: gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter On 18 Aug 2009, at 11:49, Metalitz, Steven wrote: > Could staff or Avri clarify by what date we would need to reach > agreement on the charter in order to get it on the September 3 council > agenda? the latest is a week before: 27 August for the charter and a motion but as soon as we can is best. a. Attachment:
2310153.DOC
|