Re: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Steve,

Thanks for your work on this draft. I support.

Stéphane Van Gelder


Le 26/08/09 22:24, « Metalitz, Steven » <met@xxxxxxx> a écrit :

> I <<2310153.DOC>> really don't see the need for this change but would
> not object if Mike's sentence were inserted at the end of the charter
> section, see attached.
> 
> Steve Metalitz
> 
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Rodenbaugh [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:05 PM
> To: Metalitz, Steven; gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter
> 
> Thanks Steve.
> 
> I just want to avoid people thinking the registrant
> rights/responsibilities
> doc is done after the first pass, since new or altered rights or
> responsibilities might come out of the work in Section B.  I can support
> this if it is clarified that the output of Charter section A, when
> completed, may be subject to revision upon the completion of Charter
> Section
> B3 and/or the next steps envisioned by that section.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mike
> 
> Mike Rodenbaugh
> Rodenbaugh Law
> 548 Market Street
> San Francisco, CA  94104
> +1.415.738.8087
> www.rodenbaugh.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
> On
> Behalf Of Metalitz, Steven
> Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 2:50 PM
> To: Avri Doria; gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter
> 
> Is there any objection to the revised draft charter circulated a week
> ago
> (re-attached for ready reference)?
> 
> Steve Metalitz
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 11:38 PM
> To: gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter
> 
> 
> 
> On 18 Aug 2009, at 11:49, Metalitz, Steven wrote:
> 
>> Could staff or Avri clarify by what date we would need to reach
>> agreement on the charter in order to get it on the September 3 council
> 
>> agenda?
> 
> 
> the latest is a week before: 27 August for the charter and a motion but
> as
> soon as we can is best.
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> 
>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature