Re: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

I mean coordinators

thanks
a.

On 27 Aug 2009, at 19:01, Avri Doria wrote:

> hi,
>
> if the charter is being edited, can i also suggest that we  
> substitute chair to coordinator at the bottom to match the motion?
> thanks
>
> a.
>
> On 27 Aug 2009, at 17:44, Tim Ruiz wrote:
>
> > Steve,
> >
> > One minor change to (3):
> >
> > (3) Propose next steps for considering such topics.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tim
> >
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter
> > From: "Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx>
> > Date: Wed, August 26, 2009 3:24 pm
> > To: <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > I <<2310153.DOC>> really don't see the need for this change but would
> > not object if Mike's sentence were inserted at the end of the charter
> > section, see attached.
> >
> > Steve Metalitz
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mike Rodenbaugh [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:05 PM
> > To: Metalitz, Steven; gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter
> >
> > Thanks Steve.
> >
> > I just want to avoid people thinking the registrant
> > rights/responsibilities
> > doc is done after the first pass, since new or altered rights or
> > responsibilities might come out of the work in Section B. I can  
> > support
> > this if it is clarified that the output of Charter section A, when
> > completed, may be subject to revision upon the completion of Charter
> > Section
> > B3 and/or the next steps envisioned by that section.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mike
> >
> > Mike Rodenbaugh
> > Rodenbaugh Law
> > 548 Market Street
> > San Francisco, CA 94104
> > +1.415.738.8087
> > www.rodenbaugh.com
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa- 
> > dt@xxxxxxxxx]
> > On
> > Behalf Of Metalitz, Steven
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 2:50 PM
> > To: Avri Doria; gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter
> >
> > Is there any objection to the revised draft charter circulated a week
> > ago
> > (re-attached for ready reference)?
> >
> > Steve Metalitz
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa- 
> > dt@xxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 11:38 PM
> > To: gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter
> >
> >
> >
> > On 18 Aug 2009, at 11:49, Metalitz, Steven wrote:
> >
> > > Could staff or Avri clarify by what date we would need to reach
> > > agreement on the charter in order to get it on the September 3  
> > > council
> > > agenda?
> >
> > the latest is a week before: 27 August for the charter and a motion  
> > but
> > as
> > soon as we can is best.
> >
> > a.