Re: [gnso-raa-dt] Motion for GNSO acceptance of the charter.

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I changed the wording in the shorter form that Steve suggested.
Apologies for the error. I know better but just wasn't thinking.

a.


On 27 Aug 2009, at 17:18, Carlton Samuels wrote:

> Might I suggest this small change?
>
> Carlton
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> the following is the draft of the motion i am proposing.
>
> Hi,
>
> Please send comments as soon as possible.  I have already entered it  
> into the motions list and want to send it to the Council in the next  
> few hours.
> Of course there will a week in which amendments, friendly or  
> otherwise can be made, but I would like to get some buy in from this  
> group if possible.
> Apologies for the last minute  request.
>
> thanks
> a.
>
> Motion on joint ALAC/GNSO Drafting team
>
> Proposed by Avri Doria
>
> Whereas
>
> On March 4 2009 (Resolution 20090304-2)the GNSO council committed to  
> "drafting a registrant rights charter" in cooperation with the ALAC  
> and
> As part of the same resolution (20090304-2) the GNSO council  
> committed to creating a "drafting Team to discuss further amendments  
> to the RAA and to identify those on which further action may be  
> desirable"
> Resolved
>
> The GNSO accepts the charter defined in (insert URL) with the  
> deliverables and milestones as set out in that charter and invites  
> the ALAC to participate as a partner in this effort.
> Further once the charter has been accepted by both the GNSO and  
> ALAC, the group, at its first joint meeting, will pick a pair of  
> coordinators, one each from the At-Large Community and the GNSO. The  
> chairs of the ALAC and the GNSO will be responsible for convening  
> the first meeting of the group and for putting out the call for  
> volunteers from their respective communities.
> While waiting for the chartered group to be officially formed, the  
> team responsible for creating the charter will continue the work  
> already begun by the ICANN Policy Staff (insert url) on the  
> documentation of the current set of Registrants' rights.