<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter
- To: "'Metalitz, Steven'" <met@xxxxxxx>, <gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter
- From: "Mike Rodenbaugh" <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:07:10 -0700
Thanks Steve. I am fine with this now.
-Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Metalitz, Steven [mailto:met@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 1:24 PM
To: mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter
I <<2310153.DOC>> really don't see the need for this change but would not
object if Mike's sentence were inserted at the end of the charter section,
see attached.
Steve Metalitz
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Rodenbaugh [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:05 PM
To: Metalitz, Steven; gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter
Thanks Steve.
I just want to avoid people thinking the registrant rights/responsibilities
doc is done after the first pass, since new or altered rights or
responsibilities might come out of the work in Section B. I can support
this if it is clarified that the output of Charter section A, when
completed, may be subject to revision upon the completion of Charter Section
B3 and/or the next steps envisioned by that section.
Thanks,
Mike
Mike Rodenbaugh
Rodenbaugh Law
548 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94104
+1.415.738.8087
www.rodenbaugh.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
On
Behalf Of Metalitz, Steven
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 2:50 PM
To: Avri Doria; gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter
Is there any objection to the revised draft charter circulated a week ago
(re-attached for ready reference)?
Steve Metalitz
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 11:38 PM
To: gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter
On 18 Aug 2009, at 11:49, Metalitz, Steven wrote:
> Could staff or Avri clarify by what date we would need to reach
> agreement on the charter in order to get it on the September 3 council
> agenda?
the latest is a week before: 27 August for the charter and a motion but as
soon as we can is best.
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|